Noice. I tried to do that, but the serach functions look all different. Which one did you use?
Anyway. Re: 128 - Are there still some W H in the C I A ? That's the Qurly kwestion IMO. Do we pray for them? Or us, because things are about to go AWOL? In any case, there is a very murky cloak and dagger game afoot, and I have no doubt there is a myth of fingerprints, so to speak. One thing is for sure, is that we are now in a spell-lifting phase. And is the keystone the Clinton empire?
RE: 963 Are we now in stage 5.5? I mean the 'y' is right nest to it. [Cross reference Law of War manual]:
5.5 DISCRIMINATION IN CONDUCTING ATTACKS
Under the principle of distinction, combatants may make enemy combatants and other military objectives the object of attack, but may not make the civilian population and other protected persons and objects the object of attack.
In planning and conducting attacks, decisions or determinations that a person or object isa military objective must be made in good faith based on the information available at the time, and those who plan or decide upon an attack must take feasible precautions to verify that the targets to be attacked are military objectives
Noice. I tried to do that, but the serach functions look all different. Which one did you use?
Anyway. Re: 128 - Are there still some W H in the C I A ? That's the Qurly kwestion IMO. Do we pray for them? Or us, because things are about to go AWOL? In any case, there is a very murky cloak and dagger game afoot, and I have no doubt there is a myth of fingerprints, so to speak. One thing is for sure, is that we are now in a spell-lifting phase. And is the keystone the Clinton empire?
RE: 963 Are we now in stage 5.5? I mean the 'y' is right nest to it. [Cross reference Law of War manual]:
Did you search like this [Y]? When you search a letter you have to put it in a "killbox".
I think I searched the lower case y. And I used regular brackets ( ), so that may be the issue.