ASSASSINATION UPDATE: Trump is FINE campaign reports (RSBN)
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
Strange fakery that ends up with a dead Lincoln. All sorts of backgrounds, but the perpetrators and the events are fact. I don't understand your remark about "completely oblivious" and "completetely harmless." I can't recall any attempts that were oblivious, but some that were failures. Failure does not mean fake. Especially when there are collateral casualties and a death.
I said "completely obvious" not "oblivious." His "face wound", the streak of blood across his face as he stood up to the camera; everyone will see that blood. It was in a perfect place for it to have maximum drama, while at the same time, it won't even affect his shaving tomorrow. It was completely harmless.
As for Lincoln, I am not convinced he died in the assassination attempt. I'm not going to get in to my investigation into that at this time, but there is a ton of shit that suggests that might not have been the case. I can say with reasonable confidence that either Lincoln didn't die that night, or that his son (Robert) was complicit in the assassination (which would also imply him as complicit in the assassinations of Garfield and McKinley).
Some were failures. Spectacular failures. Spectacular failures that turned out to be incredibly helpful to the "victim" (like FDR). In order to really understand these things, you have to understand that organizations like the KKK, or the corporatacracy that supposedly attempted to assassinate FDR were actually his biggest proponents. In order to understand that, you should probably read my report.
Regardless, this shit happens all the time. Where do you think Smollett got the idea from? History is absolutely riddled with such fake failed assassinations that vaulted people to some social victory (political, financial, "social justice," etc.).
Some succeeded. Some failed. Some were conspired. Some were not. You have a 2x2 possibility matrix, and any rational person would wait to see which was which. You are predicting the truth of the matter. I don't have a crystal ball, and I don't think you have, either.
But this one was not fake, it was deadly and Trump missed being killed by a small fraction of an inch---not within the realm of human capability to do deliberately, when the shooter was conspicuously missing shots and hitting other people.
You missed one. Some were faked. There is a fair bit of evidence that both FDR (on more than one occasion) and Lincoln may fall into that category.
YOU are predicting the truth of the matter. YOUR assessment is that this one was not faked. You didn't even include that as one of the available options. That is just a bit disingenuous. There are about a thousand reasons to think this was faked, and you are predicting that the future will prove your assessment correct.
I am giving my own assessment. I have given numerous reasons for why I think that (most in other threads, but if you look at my post history for the past day, you will see numerous reasons laid out). We are both doing the same thing Mr. Kettle. Don't be a kettle and pretend you're a white horse while calling me black.
Actually, it very much is. I could make that shot. Not often, and I wouldn't trust someone's life on it, but one out of ten, no problem. I am not a practiced sharpshooter however. I'm just a guy who hasn't even gone to the range in half a dozen years. But we don't even know if it was a shot. That can be faked with ease. Jesus. There is so much fake shit like that flying around; have you seen the "Ashley Babbit" footage? Anyone who has ever shot a gun that watches that would see that it was obviously faked, and yet it sold to so many people as some great tragedy. I did a substantial investigation into Ashley Babbit after that event, and I couldn't even corroborate that such a person existed, much less died. As far as I was able to find, the whole thing was nothing but fakery.
The first step to considering whether or not something is fake is to understand that such a thing can happen. Only if you allow yourself to think it is possible can you allow yourself to look at the evidence that has been presented to you in earnest; to be able to ask yourself, "why do I believe what I believe?" "What is the actual evidence that is making me believe a certain thing?"
Let's look at the actual evidence, starting with a few Q posts.
#q/326
#q/35
#/813
83 different q posts
#q/3387
He is 100% INSULATED yet we are supposed to believe that the SS failed as miserably as it seems.
You are watching a movie yet so many believe it is impossible that these incredibly impactful events were a part of the movie. It "can't be true," so you won't even consider it.
Everything has been preplanned and the Patriots are in control but Woopsie!!! we sure did drop the ball this time. Thank god we got so lucky.
Now consider, the "first bullet" hit in a very visible area, just on the side of his face where it would show perfectly to the camera as he was being led away. The odds of a bullet hitting him just there on accident and not anywhere else in the head, neck, shoulders, chest, etc. and not anywhere else that missed him (the whole rest of the world) are astronomical. As I said, I could make that shot, but not often. But I'm not that good. Other's are much better. What I couldn't do is make that shot accidentally. That's a trillion to one accident. The "bullet" (assuming it existed) could have gone anywhere, but instead it went to the exact place which would have maximum dramatic impact, but minimal actual bodily harm.
On accident.
A trillion to one odds.
But what about the rest of the bullets? Who knows where they came from, or if there were even any other bullets at all. Yes, we got reports of "someone else dying." I'm sure we'll get a full backstory on that person eventually. But all of that stuff is easily contrived. A person can be fabricated, a person's death can be fabricated. Just look at Sandy Hook. 26 children's deaths were fabricated. A whole town's grief was fabricated. Many of the "dead children" have been found as crisis actors in other events. Look at the space shuttle Challenger. Every single person that supposedly died that day has been found, living their same life under their same or similar name, including the teacher the world mourned over as one of the greatest tragedies ever.
You have no idea.
Just goes to show that Q is not infallible and should not be taken as Gospel. You might have made that shot (so you say), but the shooter didn't. The counter-sniper made his shot.
The odds of the bullet striking as it did are very low---but not a trillion to one. You are making the mistake of thinking that low odds means something is impossible, but this is not true at all. Let us say a human head or face has a frontal area of 9 x 6 inches (54 square inches) and the critical area of the bullet strike was within a square quarter inch. That would be odds of 864 to one. A real bullet dispersion profile would not be flat, but humped, so the odds might be ~10,000 to one. Far, far from a trillion to one, which is only your unconsidered attempt to be dramatic. For Trump to have survived that strike is a great providence indeed, and I think we owe it to God, not to Q.
I don't buy into the "Sandy Hook did not happen" delusion. This idea that other people have been found as "crisis actors" in other events is based on very sketchy visual identifications that are questionable at best, but absolutely not definitive in a court of law. Too many occasions of people resembling each other. On the strength of such sloppy reasoning, I simply don't give it credit. Too much reading of Rorschach blots in this community.
The Challenger crew died. Their bodies were found. There was no possibility of survival. It was a bona fide disaster with no beneficiaries. One of them was a friend of a colleague. No one comes back from the dead in this life.