You see it in videos both counter snipers fire on the kid... making a total of at least three total shooters that we know of. Not accounting for any additional sniper coverage off screen.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C,
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.
There's obviously return shots that killed the kid on the roof.
So having "3 shooters" does not mean having three shooters firing at Trump.
You see it in videos both counter snipers fire on the kid... making a total of at least three total shooters that we know of. Not accounting for any additional sniper coverage off screen.
I saw what looked like a convincing analysis that the other counter sniper position had coverage over a good area but not that area due to tree line
Good point, that crossed my mind too.
But surely, the forensics experts must have taken that into account too.
I don't know your source
aslan's post, grain of salt, cnn
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.