Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
Kitty unleashed on Twitter is discussing the second shooter in the water tower. He is posting videos of people at the rally discussing a shooter at the water tower too. The grassy knoll of today.
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
Funny you should say that because there is a long standing theory that one of the Kennedy shooters was on a lower floor within the schoolbook depository
And shoot some random innocent crowd member to increase crowd anxiety and confusion and take immediate attention off the 'origin' location possibilities of the shot.
Exactly. This is another question I have. If there was one shooter only, we are supposed to believe the first shots were so inaccurate they struck people way up in the bleachers. Then the next shot was so accurate it was nearly a kill shot? It doesn't add up.
I see a few possibilities:
I think maybe one shooter was firing distraction shots into the crowd while the other was aiming for Trump.
Perhaps one shooter was a good shot and the patsy was an off the charts terrible shot.
Another possibility is that another sniper farther away was spotted and critically wounded which then caused the would be assassin to start firing wildly into the crowd
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
Kitty unleashed on Twitter is discussing the second shooter in the water tower. He is posting videos of people at the rally discussing a shooter at the water tower too. The grassy knoll of today.
The same rooftop?
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
I think that would end up being too close.
It's like putting the real shooter on the 5th floor of the Texas book depository
Funny you should say that because there is a long standing theory that one of the Kennedy shooters was on a lower floor within the schoolbook depository
And shoot some random innocent crowd member to increase crowd anxiety and confusion and take immediate attention off the 'origin' location possibilities of the shot.
Exactly. This is another question I have. If there was one shooter only, we are supposed to believe the first shots were so inaccurate they struck people way up in the bleachers. Then the next shot was so accurate it was nearly a kill shot? It doesn't add up.
I see a few possibilities:
I think maybe one shooter was firing distraction shots into the crowd while the other was aiming for Trump.
Perhaps one shooter was a good shot and the patsy was an off the charts terrible shot.
Another possibility is that another sniper farther away was spotted and critically wounded which then caused the would be assassin to start firing wildly into the crowd