So what I am gathering is that there was a second unnamed assassin in the area that took the real shot, and the Thomas Matthew kid was a patsy to pin it all on like Lee Harvey Oswald. Don't these CIA spooks have any other playbook?
Exactly. Everything seems fishy and something tells me that we'll never know the truth. Unless you get initiated in to such matters. The question is: do you really want to be?
He didn't mention a second assassin once, only that security was likely compromised to get the shooter on the roof. I also think a closer and better trained second shooter would not have missed.
a professional sniper would have been able to accurately fire a 2nd shot.
The secondary shots that got that killed and injured the crowd are not shots of a professional, they seemed panicked.
None of us know for sure, but I speculate that this kid was the only shooter, but had inside help.
MK Ultra? I think so. kid was too young and stupid to not realize he would be killed in the process. They probably told him they would help him escape and promote him to full cia agent or something.
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
Kitty unleashed on Twitter is discussing the second shooter in the water tower. He is posting videos of people at the rally discussing a shooter at the water tower too. The grassy knoll of today.
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
So what I am gathering is that there was a second unnamed assassin in the area that took the real shot, and the Thomas Matthew kid was a patsy to pin it all on like Lee Harvey Oswald. Don't these CIA spooks have any other playbook?
I think that's what happened, too. It's the same pattern every damn time.
It doesn't make any sense that they would set this up and rely on some 20 y/o kid to succeed, so I agree there must have been a 2nd shooter.
Why didn't they just keep firing?
Trump was still on stage for a while ?
Exactly. Everything seems fishy and something tells me that we'll never know the truth. Unless you get initiated in to such matters. The question is: do you really want to be?
And they control the ballistics on the kid's rifle, and the autopsy, and everything else.
The other shooter hypothesis is appropriate, until the FACTS prove otherwise. We never did get all the facts in the Kennedy assassination.
He didn't mention a second assassin once, only that security was likely compromised to get the shooter on the roof. I also think a closer and better trained second shooter would not have missed.
Except he didn't miss. It just so happens Trump turned his head at the right moment as the trigger was pulled.
a professional sniper would have been able to accurately fire a 2nd shot.
The secondary shots that got that killed and injured the crowd are not shots of a professional, they seemed panicked.
None of us know for sure, but I speculate that this kid was the only shooter, but had inside help.
MK Ultra? I think so. kid was too young and stupid to not realize he would be killed in the process. They probably told him they would help him escape and promote him to full cia agent or something.
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
Kitty unleashed on Twitter is discussing the second shooter in the water tower. He is posting videos of people at the rally discussing a shooter at the water tower too. The grassy knoll of today.
The same rooftop?
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
I think they had a better trained second shooter further out; possibly on the water tower. Crooks may have thought he was the only shooter.
The body on the top of the building is not the kid that they're parading around on the news. Completely different.
Yeah the dead guy has long hair doesn't he? Did he grow out his hair or something?
The photos we have are two year old photos from high school.
So he easily could have grown his hair long.
8 CHAN HAS IDENTIFIED THE SHOOTER AS: MAXWELL YEARICK, NOT THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS.
Based on what?
There are some compelling arguments for each, but to me it looks like Yearick.
4chan having some good analysis: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/474283089
Yearick is 37 years old. The comparison photo they are using is 7 years old.
Before we get to compelling arguments, why did they choose yearick to focus on.
4chan. About 20% is analysis. Rest is just trash talking. Hate that place.