I'm assuming the FBI is correct absent strong evidence.
I see no reason why 4chan started looking at this yearick guy in the first place.
The shooter was said to have no ID on him. But I see two pieces of evidence that can easily be traced back to him or his family.
The gun was said to be bought by his father.
They also found his car near the rally.
.
Also the family has said No, you got the wrong guy. It's not our kid. He was upstairs playing video games
Yearick is 37 years old. The comparison photo they are using is 7 years old.
Before we get to compelling arguments, why did they choose yearick to focus on.
The media is focusing on Crooks though??
Or are you referring to 4chan??
I'm assuming the FBI is correct absent strong evidence.
I see no reason why 4chan started looking at this yearick guy in the first place.
The shooter was said to have no ID on him. But I see two pieces of evidence that can easily be traced back to him or his family.
The gun was said to be bought by his father. They also found his car near the rally. . Also the family has said No, you got the wrong guy. It's not our kid. He was upstairs playing video games
I'm the opposite: I do not assume that the FBI is correct at all.
I have no problem with real skepticism.
But like I said I'm a strong evidence guy. Also I try not to kid myself I know more about this situation than the LEO with the body and the gun.