So what I am gathering is that there was a second unnamed assassin in the area that took the real shot, and the Thomas Matthew kid was a patsy to pin it all on like Lee Harvey Oswald. Don't these CIA spooks have any other playbook?
He didn't mention a second assassin once, only that security was likely compromised to get the shooter on the roof. I also think a closer and better trained second shooter would not have missed.
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
So what I am gathering is that there was a second unnamed assassin in the area that took the real shot, and the Thomas Matthew kid was a patsy to pin it all on like Lee Harvey Oswald. Don't these CIA spooks have any other playbook?
He didn't mention a second assassin once, only that security was likely compromised to get the shooter on the roof. I also think a closer and better trained second shooter would not have missed.
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
The same rooftop?
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory