Why Vance for VP? - Perhaps a bit of clarity

posted 155 days ago by JackieDaytona74 155 days ago by JackieDaytona74 +42 / -0

I was a bit mystified by President Trump's pick of JD Vance for VP. I still don't fully understand the move, but an article I read this morning added a bit of clarity:

https://www.notus.org/trump-2024/rupert-murdoch-trump-doug-burgum-vp-j-d-vance

Bottom line: Rupert Murdoch HATES Vance to the point that the article claims Murdoch has been calling Trump multiple times per day heading up to his selection with one of the messages being "Anyone but Vance".

My question while reading the article was "Why?", and that's finally hit on at the very end with a Tucker Carlson quote:

""A lot of supposedly conservative news outlets turn out to have zero interest in anything their readers and viewers care about. Instead, they’re focused on promoting pointless wars. That’s why they’re working so hard to destroy J.D. Vance before Trump can pick him. Let’s hope they don’t succeed,” Tucker Carlson, who worked for Fox News from 2009 until 2023, told NOTUS in a statement."

Now, that quote isn't evidence, but Tucker is very plugged in. Perhaps Vance was selected in part because he doesn't have puppet strings attached to him.

Though that still doesn't explain Vance's ridiculous comments about the President a couple of years ago.

Regardless, I still don't fully understand the Vance pick. But the thought of Rupert Murdoch having heart palpitations about Vance as VP certainly makes me more comfortable with President Trump's choice.

23 comments

23 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (23)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– downrightdeplorable 1 point 155 days ago +1 / -0

They probably figured out that they could enrich themselves in Congress if they STFU and took the money.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Akka 2 points 155 days ago +2 / -0

People give up if trying to achieve anything they want to starts to look impossible. That has to be one way the DS has kept its power, they probably have concentrated quite a bit of their resources to wearing down anybody who got there and actually tried to do something, while, yes dangling the carrot of easy money in front of them at the same time. It would take pretty remarkable individuals to stay the course for years when it looks like nothing they try for will ever happen while there is the easy way available the whole time, do nothing and get rich.

Humans are fallible creatures.