Given the mounting evidence that there was a second shooter (at least), I have one question about White Hats... - The Great Awakening

Given the mounting evidence that there was a second shooter (at least), I have one question about White Hats... 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 119 days ago by changeagent 119 days ago by changeagent +43 / -0

How did this happen?

Are WH's in control, or not???

This question, I think, is at the heart of the theory that it was faked.

I do not think it was faked, so I am left with wondering how an inside job could have occurred if WH's are in control?

Yes, God saved Trump. His hand was very providential. But, why was God's hand needed in the first place?

This is where I am really confused. And "moves and counter moves" is not the answer. White Hats almost lost their guy!!!

What say you?

35 comments

35 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (35)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– MisprisionIsEvil 2 points 119 days ago +2 / -0

"White Hats are in control" is a figure of speech. Not to be taken as literally true about everything possible. That's irrational, and impossible.

Trump literally dodged a bullet. And that is not a figure of speech. The cabal almost won that day. I hope this lit a fire under Q team. Their intelligence needs to step it up, and they need to rendition some key people to GITMO.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– changeagent [S] 1 point 119 days ago +1 / -0

I think this explanation makes the most sense among all of the comments. The "secret" is to understand what is truly meant by "control" . Thanks

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q