The coincidences oh the coincidences.
Last week it was discovered that austin capital might have opened a 120m short options position on Trumps stock (DJT) the day before the assassination...
This has started to make national news and then austin capital comes out to deflect by sayig its a filing error... ok... guess we will have to trust our 3 letter agents to determine truth on that. The anons digging also linked them to the Bush family.
But then there's Doug Mills. Doug also has connections to the Bush family and was the man responsible for photographing Bush in the elementary school the day of the 911 attack. Doug is the photographer who was at the Trump rally and caught the bullet streaked photo.
Any optical engineer or professional photographer, such as Doug Mills knows this photo taken is very suspicious... why would Doug Mills be at a Trump rally and have a camera capturing that many frames per second? First a high speed camera that can capture a bullet traveling at 3000 feet per second is not something you would be usig at a Trump rally. The exposure time of that speed would drown out the light and be useless to capture still photos. It would also fill any memory card up so quickly with over exposed garbage photos.
Maybe Doug is just a stupid photographer... or maybe he knew and was expecting the photo of Trump's head explodig, to seed everywhere and literally start a civil war.
Im sure META had no knowledge of it either, which is why Trumps FB account magically is unbanned the day before so all those who use FB could see the coincidental Doug Mills photo being tagged for DJT to really piss folks off.
Anyways... im sure we just have a big coincidence here and shouldn't look at it as anything but that. ,(Sarcasm)
"I would never shoot at 1/8000 unless I was at a sporting event."
So with an fstop of 1.6 and an ISO of 50 to 100 you're telling me that wouldn't give you a proper exposure? Especially when you are trying to include a fluttering flag in the background?
I often shoot at 1.4 and it never required that high of a shutter speed. And wtf about a fluttering flag, omg you don't need 1/8000 to capture a fluttering flag, are you serious?
Yeah I'm sure you do. The exposure is proper for f1.6. Making the most uncharitable argument still isn't evidence of anything nefarious.
https://files.catbox.moe/jkjrgn.png
I'm not arguing that it's evidence of anything nefarious, all I've ever said in every damn thread about this is that 1/8000 is overkill imo. You can't sit here and say f1.6 with 1/8000 is "proper exposure" when there are still other variables like focal distance, iso, light temperature and the light reading on the subject itself that all effect the final result, and no 2 sunny days are the same ffs. Not to mention the variation between different camera brands and different lenses depending on how many elements they have. I've been shooting professionally for over 20 years but you are going to sit here and argue with me because you found an online calculator, are you even serious rn?
When it comes to exposure
F1.6 is F1.6
50 ISO is 50 ISO
1/8000 of a second is 1/8000 of a second.
the DoF of a 24mm at f1.6 at 20ft is 26.85 ft.
Depth of field in front 6.68 ft (24.90%)
Depth of field behind 20.16 ft (75.10%)
The Dof at 10ft is 5.33 ft
Depth of field in front 2.00 ft (37.50%)
Depth of field behind 3.33 ft (62.50%)
If you're set at 1.6 with aperture priority with an iso of 50 your camera is going to max the mechanical shutter speed when it's exposing for a mostly clear blue sky.
Yes I'm serious right now. You people keep going on and on about the shutter speed when it's a dead horse. Stop beating it.