The coincidences oh the coincidences.
Last week it was discovered that austin capital might have opened a 120m short options position on Trumps stock (DJT) the day before the assassination...
This has started to make national news and then austin capital comes out to deflect by sayig its a filing error... ok... guess we will have to trust our 3 letter agents to determine truth on that. The anons digging also linked them to the Bush family.
But then there's Doug Mills. Doug also has connections to the Bush family and was the man responsible for photographing Bush in the elementary school the day of the 911 attack. Doug is the photographer who was at the Trump rally and caught the bullet streaked photo.
Any optical engineer or professional photographer, such as Doug Mills knows this photo taken is very suspicious... why would Doug Mills be at a Trump rally and have a camera capturing that many frames per second? First a high speed camera that can capture a bullet traveling at 3000 feet per second is not something you would be usig at a Trump rally. The exposure time of that speed would drown out the light and be useless to capture still photos. It would also fill any memory card up so quickly with over exposed garbage photos.
Maybe Doug is just a stupid photographer... or maybe he knew and was expecting the photo of Trump's head explodig, to seed everywhere and literally start a civil war.
Im sure META had no knowledge of it either, which is why Trumps FB account magically is unbanned the day before so all those who use FB could see the coincidental Doug Mills photo being tagged for DJT to really piss folks off.
Anyways... im sure we just have a big coincidence here and shouldn't look at it as anything but that. ,(Sarcasm)
Oh ok. Enlighten me.
How about you go learn for yourself. Buy yourself a rig and go shoot something. Don't forget your polarizing filter for your full sun day shoots, no photographer would be caught dead without one - yet another variable missing from your armature calculations.
Polarization filters only work, well, when you're about 90 degrees turned from the sun. It also adds reflections (off the objective lens) and degrades sharpness. It's more suitable for removing reflections on cars if you take multiple shots from a tripod. If you want a bluer sky you can do that in post.
Did you really think you were talking to someone that hasn't used a camera?
It also doesn't refute anything I previously mentioned.
You can argue till you are blue in the face, you can look up all the google "facts" you want, you can touch a camera if it makes you feel special, doesn't change the fact this is still my career and from my point of view you sound ridiculous trying so hard to argue with your bucket of half-facts.
And in case you didn't hear me the first time, 1/8000 is still OVERKILL.
Again, at f1.6, 50 iso, it's not outside the realm of possibility that's what the camera chose for exposure because it fits the conditions. Even if it was a manual setting, an A1 has plenty of range to recover the highlights and shadows at those settings.
I'm not the one getting blue in the face. The facts are on my side. You're grabbing at straws.
Edit: Also I replied to you in 4 minutes about the polarization filter. You think I googled that?
And just because it's your career doesn't mean you're good or know everything there is to know.