The "shooter" building is a one story tall building. But the building behind the "shooter" building is two stories tall, at least part of it. Easy place to put the real shooter, and hide him with cover.
Immediately after the shots were fired, there could have been corrupt SS standing around and closing off the entire area as a crime scene, preventing anyone not in the loop from investigating the area. This is exactly what happened with JFK, where witnesses rushed towards the grassy knoll immediately after shots were fired, but were kept away by men who claimed to be SS or police.
Real shooter puts real weapon away inside the building, and emerges as a SS guy, "helping" to process the scene.
This would have been the easiest way to do it, with the shooter on the roof as the decoy/patsy.
Same exact scenario as JFK, with the patsy supposedly in the Texas School Book Depository, while the real shooter was across the street in the Dal-Tex building (and another on the grassy knoll). BTW, that building is now an office building, and the offices where the real shooter would have been, with a clear line-of-sight right down Elm Street (better than the "Oswald nest"), are closed off to the public.
Here, aerial photos do not show that the building behind the "shooter" building is two stories. But ground view photos do.
An interesting question to ask is: Who was close enough to Trump to suggest Butler PA as a good place to give a speech? Whoever that was, could be a threat to Trump.
“An interesting question to ask is: Who was close enough to Trump to suggest Butler PA as a good place to give a speech? Whoever that was, could be a threat to Trump.”
The location of the event seems perfectly designed for an ambush like this. Who chose that location? Was there a different location originally and then it was moved there?
This is what I have been thinking.
The "shooter" building is a one story tall building. But the building behind the "shooter" building is two stories tall, at least part of it. Easy place to put the real shooter, and hide him with cover.
Immediately after the shots were fired, there could have been corrupt SS standing around and closing off the entire area as a crime scene, preventing anyone not in the loop from investigating the area. This is exactly what happened with JFK, where witnesses rushed towards the grassy knoll immediately after shots were fired, but were kept away by men who claimed to be SS or police.
Real shooter puts real weapon away inside the building, and emerges as a SS guy, "helping" to process the scene.
This would have been the easiest way to do it, with the shooter on the roof as the decoy/patsy.
Same exact scenario as JFK, with the patsy supposedly in the Texas School Book Depository, while the real shooter was across the street in the Dal-Tex building (and another on the grassy knoll). BTW, that building is now an office building, and the offices where the real shooter would have been, with a clear line-of-sight right down Elm Street (better than the "Oswald nest"), are closed off to the public.
Here, aerial photos do not show that the building behind the "shooter" building is two stories. But ground view photos do.
An interesting question to ask is: Who was close enough to Trump to suggest Butler PA as a good place to give a speech? Whoever that was, could be a threat to Trump.
“An interesting question to ask is: Who was close enough to Trump to suggest Butler PA as a good place to give a speech? Whoever that was, could be a threat to Trump.”
This needs to be addressed as a top priority
Agreed
The location of the event seems perfectly designed for an ambush like this. Who chose that location? Was there a different location originally and then it was moved there?