When the internet came along, there was no more need to be inquisitive in chat by actually asking others a question. Matter of fact doing so would often be met with reply of "look it up for youself".

Now with AI there is no longer a need for us to think at all, except as far as telling AI to answer for us.

The skill of thinking is becoming a dying art.

So nobody will use original God given responses anymore? Piss on that!!!!! Murica🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

It might be free, but it also seems quite biased to me. Example:

Why was hydroxy chloroquine and ivermectin suppressed during the covid pandemic?

Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were suppressed during the COVID-19 pandemic due to a combination of factors. First, there was a lack of robust scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness in treating COVID-19. Second, there were concerns about potential side effects and toxicity associated with these drugs when used for COVID-19 treatment. Third, there was a push for the development and distribution of vaccines, which were proven to be effective in preventing COVID-19 infections. Lastly, political and media influences played a role in shaping public opinion on these drugs, leading to their suppression.

1. There was ample research in their effectiveness in treating covid.

2. There were concerns from the establishment, and a study was published in the Lancet "proving" that hydroxy chloroquine was dangerous, but that study was pulled because there was no scientific basis for its claims.

3. Actually, it was quickly found, that the vaccines did not prevent covid, or its spread.

1. While there were some studies that suggested hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin might have potential benefits in treating COVID-19, the overall body of evidence was not strong enough to support widespread use. Many of the studies were small, had methodological limitations, or did not show consistent results. Consequently, health authorities, such as the World Health Organization and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, did not recommend these drugs for COVID-19 treatment.

2. The Lancet study you mentioned was indeed retracted due to concerns about the data and methodology used. However, this single study was not the sole reason for the suppression of hydroxychloroquine. The broader scientific consensus remained that the evidence supporting its use for COVID-19 was insufficient.

3. While it is true that COVID-19 vaccines do not offer 100% protection against infection or transmission, they have been proven to be highly effective in preventing severe disease, hospitalization, and death. This is supported by numerous studies and real-world data, which demonstrate that vaccinated individuals are significantly less likely to experience severe COVID-19 outcomes compared to unvaccinated individuals.