I wonder if the FBI spraying off the “sloped roof” was to get rid of this...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
I saw those, but there are also some that try to get the distance by the sound of the report. A suppressor would add another variable in there that those theories did not account for.
Suppressors don't work like most people think they do. That's why they are SUPPRESSORS and no silencers. They simply change the tone of the shot. I wouldn't be surprised if the shots from the window were suppressed. If you check out any video of being down-range of a suppressed shot, you can still hear it. It's just different. Suppressors are meant to protect the hearing of the shooter. The only "Hollywood" quite suppressors are .22 cal. And even those depends on the distance to which they are shot. To me, the shots from the window do sound suppressed. The first 3 don't.
I'm going to go off on a slight tangent. IMO, we are currently and have been in Devolution, or COG. I know there are a lot of people who don't buy into that, and you are also welcome to your own opinions. This is mine. It is military practice to always have a satellite over the CIC. I believe for multiple reasons. First is recon, second is comms. That being said, I believe the military has not only the overhead evidence from what occurred, but they also have all radio comms during that day, and any and all text/email and other communications about the planning and execution of their plan. It's just a matter of time before it's made public. It will probably be quite a while, most def into next year before this occurs. I think that, along with proof of every other attempt on his life.
Thanks - I know. I put that in my first comment...
If I thought they silenced and not suppressed I would call them silencers, like everyone else wants to call them.
My whole point is if there was a suppressor involved it would change the sound picked up, and different assumptions would need to be made. If the sound of a .223 is 175 decibels and a suppressor is used, the new decibel level could be 135. That could make it (from a distance) sound further away that it normally would. From a shorter distance it can make it difficult to tell where the shot actually came from (the angle).
I understand that. But "sounding further away" is one thing. The audible evidence that Mike Adams uses, doesn't use tone. It uses time to get distance. It may have very well sounded further away, but the data doesn't lie. And that won't tell the angle, it only gives distance from the microphone that picked up the sound. And the microphone that was used in his documentation was the mic that Trump was using when the shots were fired. So far as I know.