When someone makes a remark that has no coherence, it is fruitless to fill in the blank with your favorite vegetable. For her, "continuity of government" may refer to the oligarchs pushing Biden around.
There's not much to discuss except our prejudices. Better to wait the proverbial 72 hours. It is one thing to chase a rat. It is a waste of time to chase imaginary rats.
"Continuity of Government" is a specific term that is very clearly outlined. There are five levels. We were in level 2 for several hours on 9/11, and we entered it again on 1/18/21, two days prior to the hoax inauguration.
I can't retrace the thread on this, but the essence of the case is that I disagreed with "queue-anon" that this was all a confirmation of the devolution theory, and that Trump would not have given up control over security assets. I said the evidence is that he had, was nearly killed for it, and this theory doesn't hold water.
Cheatle spoke some vague words using "continuity of government" but all I pointed out is that, like the Jedi mind trick, this "continuity of government" at they think of it may not be what we are thinking. Are you saying it is impossible for her to be thinking of it in a self-serving incorrect way? That would be a great Jedi trick.
The only way for that theory to work would be if Trump, Q, and the rest, were the greatest liars and deceivers on the face of the Earth. And I simply don't accept that as a premise. If you like it as a premise, too bad for you.
That's exactly how it should be taken as how she said it.
She slipped up.
But here's how it will play out. We haven't seen JB, speculation is he passed, etc.
Now if that's the case, who's running the G? The same people that were before he passed. The SES!
The SES is the deep state. Unelected appointed positions, who use their corporate money to control behind the scenes. That's rudimentary form.
If we want to drain the swamp, get rid of SES.
If the ds made everyone stand down and this attempt was real, it has SES fingerprints all over it.
When someone makes a remark that has no coherence, it is fruitless to fill in the blank with your favorite vegetable. For her, "continuity of government" may refer to the oligarchs pushing Biden around.
It is fruitful to discuss it though. We are citizen researchers. Debate is good.
There's not much to discuss except our prejudices. Better to wait the proverbial 72 hours. It is one thing to chase a rat. It is a waste of time to chase imaginary rats.
"Continuity of Government" is a specific term that is very clearly outlined. There are five levels. We were in level 2 for several hours on 9/11, and we entered it again on 1/18/21, two days prior to the hoax inauguration.
I wasn't commenting on that at all.
Of course you did, it's right there in your comment...
You ignored the actual meaning of the term, and said that it "may refer" to something different.
I can't retrace the thread on this, but the essence of the case is that I disagreed with "queue-anon" that this was all a confirmation of the devolution theory, and that Trump would not have given up control over security assets. I said the evidence is that he had, was nearly killed for it, and this theory doesn't hold water.
Cheatle spoke some vague words using "continuity of government" but all I pointed out is that, like the Jedi mind trick, this "continuity of government" at they think of it may not be what we are thinking. Are you saying it is impossible for her to be thinking of it in a self-serving incorrect way? That would be a great Jedi trick.
The only way for that theory to work would be if Trump, Q, and the rest, were the greatest liars and deceivers on the face of the Earth. And I simply don't accept that as a premise. If you like it as a premise, too bad for you.
That's exactly how it should be taken as how she said it. She slipped up. But here's how it will play out. We haven't seen JB, speculation is he passed, etc. Now if that's the case, who's running the G? The same people that were before he passed. The SES!
The SES is the deep state. Unelected appointed positions, who use their corporate money to control behind the scenes. That's rudimentary form. If we want to drain the swamp, get rid of SES.
If the ds made everyone stand down and this attempt was real, it has SES fingerprints all over it.