"Continuity of Government" is a specific term that is very clearly outlined. There are five levels. We were in level 2 for several hours on 9/11, and we entered it again on 1/18/21, two days prior to the hoax inauguration.
I can't retrace the thread on this, but the essence of the case is that I disagreed with "queue-anon" that this was all a confirmation of the devolution theory, and that Trump would not have given up control over security assets. I said the evidence is that he had, was nearly killed for it, and this theory doesn't hold water.
Cheatle spoke some vague words using "continuity of government" but all I pointed out is that, like the Jedi mind trick, this "continuity of government" at they think of it may not be what we are thinking. Are you saying it is impossible for her to be thinking of it in a self-serving incorrect way? That would be a great Jedi trick.
The only way for that theory to work would be if Trump, Q, and the rest, were the greatest liars and deceivers on the face of the Earth. And I simply don't accept that as a premise. If you like it as a premise, too bad for you.
Everyone took COG as a way to run with devolution, etc. The words stated fot their cognitive view.
Now if you understand the SES and that Cheatle is SES, her words have different meaning.
Imo too many people quick to respond. It's reactionary based on COG being said, and the response gets wild. Everyone thinks they caught a slip and are first to acknowledge.
Understand who she is, how she got there, what positions she was given, and what she's saying.
"Continuity of Government" is a specific term that is very clearly outlined. There are five levels. We were in level 2 for several hours on 9/11, and we entered it again on 1/18/21, two days prior to the hoax inauguration.
I wasn't commenting on that at all.
Of course you did, it's right there in your comment...
You ignored the actual meaning of the term, and said that it "may refer" to something different.
I can't retrace the thread on this, but the essence of the case is that I disagreed with "queue-anon" that this was all a confirmation of the devolution theory, and that Trump would not have given up control over security assets. I said the evidence is that he had, was nearly killed for it, and this theory doesn't hold water.
Cheatle spoke some vague words using "continuity of government" but all I pointed out is that, like the Jedi mind trick, this "continuity of government" at they think of it may not be what we are thinking. Are you saying it is impossible for her to be thinking of it in a self-serving incorrect way? That would be a great Jedi trick.
The only way for that theory to work would be if Trump, Q, and the rest, were the greatest liars and deceivers on the face of the Earth. And I simply don't accept that as a premise. If you like it as a premise, too bad for you.
Everyone took COG as a way to run with devolution, etc. The words stated fot their cognitive view. Now if you understand the SES and that Cheatle is SES, her words have different meaning. Imo too many people quick to respond. It's reactionary based on COG being said, and the response gets wild. Everyone thinks they caught a slip and are first to acknowledge. Understand who she is, how she got there, what positions she was given, and what she's saying.