🔥🔥🔥🔥They have been named...FRANKISTS...Candace handles this flawlessly. It's all infiltration, everything...
(www.youtube.com)
Cabal History
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
That doesn't equate to America's founding being Catholic, only to the fact that, like the Freemasons and other secret societies, there was a parallel Catholic presence during the time of America's founding. I say that every satanic force was vying for the American throne before it was even established!
From AI:
The first European explorers and settlers in North America were primarily Spanish and French, both of whom were predominantly Catholic. - simple expansionism
Additionally, the Catholic Church played a significant role in the establishment of the early American colonies, providing financial support, missionaries, and guidance in the development of religious and social institutions. - par for their course as they always seek to expand and to meddle in the affairs of all nations to embed themselves within them. To me this appears to be nothing more than the Catholic church attempting to set up Catholic enclaves around the world, as is one of their primary missions, always and everywhere. They even call their outposts MISSIONS!
Furthermore, the influence of Catholic political philosophy, particularly in the works of Thomas Aquinas and other scholastic thinkers, can be seen in the founding documents of the United States, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. These documents reflect concepts like natural law, the social contract, and the inalienable rights of individuals, which have their roots in Catholic thought. - this is interesting. How do these concepts have their roots in Catholic thought when that same church has been the primary obsticle of personal freedom in the entire world? If anything these concepts seem more Masonic than Catholic to me, though I'd argue that they are actually Christian concepts...
However, it is essential to recognize that the United States was also heavily influenced by Protestantism, particularly in the form of the Puritans and other religious dissenters who sought refuge in the New World. The Protestant work ethic, religious freedom, and democratic principles that are often associated with America's founding can all be traced back to these early Protestant settlers. - this jives more with what I understand to be true about America's founding
Mother Mary appeared to the Mexicans in the 16th natives. Over 9 Million Indians converted to Christianity because of that apperition.
Sorry, it was God's providence that led Catholics to conquer the Americas just as Christianity was dying in Europe at that same exact time. America's destiny does not belong to Freemasons & their Atlantian abitions, it belongs to Christ the King.
Can you rewrite that? kek, not sure I follow your comment completely but I'd like to read up on that. Do you have any links?
I agree with you there fren. Just trying to hone in on it, wherever it leads.
the Virgin Mary appeared to Saint Juan Diego (San Diego was named after him) , a man of Aztec descent who had converted to Christianity, on December 9, 1531. She asked Juan Diego to build a shrine on the spot where she had appeared, Tepeyac Hill, now in a suburb of Mexico City. this apparition, in which Our Lady manifested herself to the native peoples of Mexico as a sign of her maternal care, nine million accepted the Catholic faith. Think of this beautiful story in contrast to the way Protestants & Freemasons treated the indigenous of North America.
Mind you, had the Masons not launched the Masonic French Revolution & sold off American territories to the American Masons (Louisana Purchase), has had the Masons not launchedthe Mexican Revolutions, 2/3rd of America would belong to Catholic Monarchies & not Masons.
Do we know for sure there was no Catholic presence in the region beforehand? I hold things like this in low esteem, both currently and from the past
It would appear that the one forced the natives out while the other converted them in but this doesn't automatically mean that they were converted to the whole truth.
Well, I'm chalking that one up to a divine counter-move. Now they both have their representation but neither one gets to rule. I see that favorably, as I do not submit to either. If they have secret pacts or agreements allocating portions of global power to one another in an effort to co-exist as the rulers of the world, they must be exposed for the world to see. Demand to know who your supposed rulers are!