If she's not black enough for you---why are you bothering to have narrow standards for who is "black" and who can claim to be black? How can you tell me you are racist without telling me?
Well, she isn't black, it isn't about race-she is claiming to be something she is not-which most Dems/Commies do all the time; except what they really are!
She MUST not be proud, enough, of who she really is.
How do you define "black"? Is there a definition, or do we adopt the standard used in the time of slavery: one drop of black "blood" is sufficient? If that's how blacks view it, why should we object? You don't seem to accept a mixed-race world in which a person can be Indian and black simultaneously.
I'm approximately equal parts English, Dutch, German, and Swiss. Is there some standard by which I can never call myself as, say, "English"?
I, personally, think you are way over thinking this. Kamala has stated in the past she is from India. She is a mixed race, but she now calls herself black. How do you reconcile her statements-whatever you do think-I really don't care. She is not black. You can call yourself black, also, if you want, but you probably wouldn't be!
And her family had slaves-so maybe she was also a slave!
It is really weird to watch someone think as a racist. I'm equal parts English, Dutch, German, and Swiss. Am I somehow a liar if I describe myself in passing as being English? Or that if I mentioned I was also German, that would require that I "reconcile" my statements? You are the one who is over-thinking this.
"Her family" in this case was a distant great-grandparent. Hardly relevant.
If she's not black enough for you---why are you bothering to have narrow standards for who is "black" and who can claim to be black? How can you tell me you are racist without telling me?
Well, she isn't black, it isn't about race-she is claiming to be something she is not-which most Dems/Commies do all the time; except what they really are! She MUST not be proud, enough, of who she really is.
How do you define "black"? Is there a definition, or do we adopt the standard used in the time of slavery: one drop of black "blood" is sufficient? If that's how blacks view it, why should we object? You don't seem to accept a mixed-race world in which a person can be Indian and black simultaneously.
I'm approximately equal parts English, Dutch, German, and Swiss. Is there some standard by which I can never call myself as, say, "English"?
I, personally, think you are way over thinking this. Kamala has stated in the past she is from India. She is a mixed race, but she now calls herself black. How do you reconcile her statements-whatever you do think-I really don't care. She is not black. You can call yourself black, also, if you want, but you probably wouldn't be! And her family had slaves-so maybe she was also a slave!
It is really weird to watch someone think as a racist. I'm equal parts English, Dutch, German, and Swiss. Am I somehow a liar if I describe myself in passing as being English? Or that if I mentioned I was also German, that would require that I "reconcile" my statements? You are the one who is over-thinking this.
"Her family" in this case was a distant great-grandparent. Hardly relevant.