So, last night Kamala says "ThanQ" 17 times to start her "rally" And this is today's Delta - The Great Awakening

221

So, last night Kamala says "ThanQ" 17 times to start her "rally" And this is today's Delta (twitter.com) Q-analysis!

posted 143 days ago by queue-anon 143 days ago by queue-anon +227 / -6

97 comments

97 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (97)

sorted by:

▲ 9 ▼

– Dogsoldier2 9 points 143 days ago +9 / -0

But those were running as VP with the president when he was elected, hence they were elected. Ford was asked to take the VP position by Nixon when the current VP Spiro Agnew resigned. Then Nixon resigned in Aug. 1974 and Ford was sworn in as president. I remember it all well because I was in the military at the time.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– HardWorkinPatriot 2 points 143 days ago +2 / -0

Oh, Ok. Now, I understand what you meant.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– inspoken 1 point 143 days ago +1 / -0

How did you feel about serving under Ford instead of Nixon? Did you notice any difference?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Dogsoldier2 2 points 143 days ago +2 / -0

To be honest I didn't really care. Politics in the military wasn't that big a deal back then. When I went in I was expecting to go to 'Nam but by the time I finished my training (18 months) Nixon had already started the draw down so there were very few deployments going in country. I got out of the military in early 1975 so Ford wasn't my CIC for long.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q