I'll check into that thesis, ty!

I ended up asking an AI for some clues, pretty satisfied with where I ended up:

Q - tell me about the power structure and form of government at the Tower of Babel under Nimrod

The Tower of Babel, a structure mentioned in the Book of Genesis, was believed to be built by Nimrod, a powerful ruler who established a kingdom in ancient Mesopotamia. Nimrod is often described as a mighty hunter and a tyrant who sought to unite people under his oppressive rule. The form of government at the Tower of Babel can be considered a dictatorship, with Nimrod holding absolute power over his subjects. The construction of the tower was a symbol of Nimrod's ambition and desire for control, as he aimed to build a monument that would reach the heavens. However, according to biblical accounts, God intervened and confused the languages of the people, leading to the dispersion of humanity and the abandonment of the tower's construction.

Q - now tell me about the power structure and form of government God set up in Israel

The power structure and form of government in ancient Israel, as established by God, can be divided into several distinct periods. Initially, Israel was governed by judges, who were chosen by God to lead and deliver the people from various threats. These judges were not hereditary rulers, but rather individuals who were divinely appointed and served for a specific period or purpose. After the judges, Israel transitioned to a monarchy, with Saul, David, and Solomon being the first kings. The kings were expected to rule according to God's laws and serve as His representatives on Earth. However, Israel eventually divided into two separate kingdoms, with the northern Kingdom of Israel and the southern Kingdom of Judah each having their own monarchs. Over time, both kingdoms fell into disobedience and were conquered by foreign powers.

Q - now contrast these forms of government (Nimrod's and God's)

Nimrod's form of government can be characterized as a dictatorship, with absolute power concentrated in the hands of a single ruler. In contrast, God's form of government in Israel was more decentralized and focused on divine guidance. Initially, Israel was led by judges who were divinely appointed and served specific purposes. The subsequent monarchy, while still centered around a single ruler, was expected to adhere to God's laws and serve as His representative. The key difference between these two forms of government is the role of divine guidance and the emphasis on moral and spiritual values, which were central to God's system but absent in Nimrod's oppressive regime.

Q - is it fair to say that a primary difference would be:

Nimrod ruled by fiat decree

Israel ruled by God's Constitution

Yes, it is fair to say that a primary difference between the forms of government under Nimrod and in ancient Israel is that Nimrod ruled by fiat decree, meaning his power was absolute and unchecked, while Israel was governed according to God's divine laws, which can be likened to a constitution. In Israel, the rulers were expected to adhere to these laws and lead the people in accordance with God's will, whereas Nimrod's rule was characterized by oppressive and self-serving decrees.

So, now we can be on the lookout for any system like this, where the leader can simply decree a thing and everyone below must follow it. I immediately think of the pope and their "papal bulls" and "infallability doctrines"

I also think about a POTUS and "Executive Orders"... a POTUS cannot make laws, and yet he can, in essence.....

Not to mention the secretive intel agencies who basically do whatever they want and are unaccountable to the people. "The ends justify the means"