Anyone else notice a shift in the content being posted here? Similar to Youtubers posting misleading content with sensationalized titles with all caps with no content to back it up. I thought it could be purposeful misinformation to mislead. Then I thought they could be posts that make us look like idiots to the outside world.
I am sure the mods have their hands full and do a marvelous job of sifting the BS. They can't stop them all though. I still think we have paid trolls disrupting the flow of information here. I wouldnt be surprised at all if we found out the Krassenstein morons are here posting under some Maga alias.
Okay, jokes fine.
But yep, downvotes. I suppose I am not making my point all that clearly.
Which is that if this is supposed to be the public face of Q, you should consider what people fresh from a lifetime of believing MSM might be able to look at without immediately dismissing it as idiotic if they happen to wander here.
IF you want more of them to your side.
A lot of times this forum seems more like an echo chamber, really, people who are already in come here to play with each other.
And that is not a good way to get more people here.
But whatever. Just keep playing.
Don’t forget, Q and Q+ have put a HUGE emphasis on memes. Tons and tons of drops about memes. I don’t see anything wrong with memes about big mike personally.
Neither do I.
I believe Mike is Mike. I knew 2 Trannies personally. I have "assisted" maybe a dozen through my job. Women that switch to a man can often pull it off pretty well. Maybe because there are plenty of feminine dudes out there. I have never seen a man pull of the woman switch with any beliveability. Every one is a dude wearing heals and lipstick. IMO Mike is a dude wearing heals and lipstick. I know some strong ass women. None of them have the linebacker back/traps that Mike has. Most men can only dream of having that build. That isn't exercise, that is genetics.
But again. I have no "proof". Just my Testosterone fueled opinion.
That is pretty much what I am after. I don't see much of a problem when somebody says something like that, speculates about that or of similar cases when something looks possible or probable. Or when people joke about the possibility. Or make memes about it.
What is a problem when "normies" wander into the case and then somebody tells them that they know for a fact that something is so. Without actually having that real proof about it. When somebody who has maybe just recently started to wonder if there might be something about this Q thing after all runs into something like that hell of a lot of them will turn right away and run the other way, convinced that what the legacy media has been saying about that Qanon stuff is probably right after all, they are just conspiracy nuts.
Think about it in terms of trying to tame a half wild dog or something. You have to make them trust you, and your thinking and opinions, first, and that trust takes a while. And you have to approach carefully, one step at a time. Give them what they are most able to take seriously. In small doses. And you might be able to reel them in.
Or joke about the more controversial things, like "Big Mike", and maybe then wonder a bit if there just might be something to it because... and give some examples which seem to point in that direction. Just don't jump to "it's a fact" as the first thing. Or as second or third. Or keep talking about it. Just give them enough to make them think about it.