Just a Reminder that the Deep States Lies and the REASON they Lie to us is NOTHING NEW !!🤡🌎
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Watch it again, because you clearly missed some points. Videos from bystanders were tightly controlled, and only released to the public long after the fact, with clear modifications made.
That leaves your whole argument relying on the idea that too many people "saw the plane impact", but... can we trust that? if people see a plane flying in the vicinity and then hear a huge explosion, they'll claim to have seen the impact, even though they didn't.
how many eyewitness accounts have you personally heard? and is it more than fit on the deep states payroll in 2001?
interviews with people in the area at the time included just as many people who said there was no plane, just an explosion, like a bomb.
but, uhh, you tend not to see those people on tv quite as often.
nah. the evidence you've chosen to ignore is irrefutable.
I've heard 3 from family relatives 1 was a police officer, 1 is a taxi driver, and the last did odd jobs, was washing windows outside at the time. They all watched the 2nd one, the window wash saw the first. And yes I will take a few 1000 eye witnesses over someone who wasn't there.
ah, so you have a personal investment in the official story. that will definitely make it difficult to examine evidence properly. but if you care about truth, you will.
When new claims emerge that contradict the accounts of thousands of eyewitnesses, it's critical to assess these claims with a healthy dose of skepticism. Disregarding firsthand accounts and overwhelming evidence in favor of later, non-forensic theories is not a rational approach. Instead, it's more logical to question the validity of the contradictory opinion rather than dismiss the consistent and corroborated testimonies of those who witnessed the event firsthand.
To disregard the substantial body of evidence and eyewitness accounts in favor of speculative theories is to undermine the principles of critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning.
lol WHAT substantial body of evidence?? all we have are a few people who say they saw a plane. that is all the evidence you're going off. Ironic to use the word 'substantial' when its all just people talking.
Lmao, I'm not sure where you got that from, I think you should reread my first post on here.
the official story being that planes hit the towers, your personal investment being due to anecdotes from family members.
refusal to examine evidence is not a strong standpoint. you've been linked several compilations of evidence, and you continue to fall back on supposed eyewitness accounts.
nobody is going to report a plane not hitting a tower, not in a place like NY where they fly overhead all the time.
we have eyewitness accounts supporting the official story, but we also have eyewitness accounts saying there was no plane, only a bomb-like explosion.
you are discarding evidence because none of the eyewitnesses could possibly be mistaken or lying. that's wrong. and we have eyewitnesses with conflicting stories.. some supporting the official story, and some saying there were no planes.
the best thing to do is to examine the evidence. if you refuse to do that, you are just admitting you have no ground to stand on.
refute the evidence provided to you, or weaken your position even further.