Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

37
Nuke scare incoming: tactical warheads being deployed to “deter” Iran (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by Huckleberry1776 1 year ago by Huckleberry1776 +37 / -0
11 comments share
11 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (11)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Malachi 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Wait what? When did Iran say that they have nukes? All I heard was that a parliament member saying (awhile ago) that they have the capacity to make nukes quickly if they wanted to...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JacksonsButler 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I read over the weekend that iran announced it had nukes. Not sure if they made them or if Russia gave it to them. Russia did say that they would arm our enemies just as we have armed Ukraine.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Malachi 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

The only thing I could find close to Iran announcing it has nukes is this tweet: https://x.com/global__eyes/status/1819804411931349183

Hardly a primary source...

Besides, this is the same politician I was referring to: Article is from May 13, 2024. https://archive.ph/kVSPL

In the article from May 2024 he said this:

"In my opinion, we have achieved nuclear weapons, but we do not announce it..."

Now all of a sudden the US is going bonkers over this? I smell fear porn. Especially since the markets are down now. The cabal needs their war and an excuse as to why the markets are going down (narrative play).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Retaining_H2O 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

All is fair in love and war... I guess.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Huckleberry1776 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It’s an interesting point. Do they have nukes or is this just part of a narrative to justify war? I’ve heard in my industry (just rumors) that Iran may have been supplied nukes by a foreign nation that has them…ie NK.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Malachi 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

China rumored to have supplied Iran with nukes months ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybq3g5bxyX4

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuckaFree 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The U S has been saying that for a decade now. There is no real Intel that's being shared that says Iran has nukes. Now, that's not to say they don't have the capability to make a dirty bomb. They do have that capability, but the trigger mechanism to make a nuclear weapon is much different than just wrapping nuclear material around explosives, which is what most people think of when it comes to nuclear weapons. Unless Iran was given that capability it's very hard to figure it out with substandard nuclear and weapons scientists. This is why only a relative few countries actually have nukes. It isn't the overall financial cost of making them, but more a question of scientific and technical know how to make one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Revodude 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Six to seven nukes was quite a while ago. I would estimate 8-10 nukes by now. I expect the first one or two were gun nukes (two subcritical uranium parts fired together to be supercritical). They may have repurposed them into more advanced nukes.

Add to the bingo card that the US uses one of our new subterranean nukes on the Iranian nuclear facility. Optics to keep Trump’s hands clean.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuckaFree 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There is no such thing as a "tactical nuke." Nukes are nukes, and are strategic in nature. Only their deployment is tactical, which is to say that the deployment if any nuke is a tactical decision. It also happens to be the wrong decision. Also, why deploy nukes to that AOR if Iran has none, as is the Western Intel Ageny's collective outlook re Iran?

Edit: if the "Biden Admin" is deploying nukes, then WHs may not be in as much control like we're led to believe, and devolution isn't a thing because there's no way in Hell that Trump would let the "Biden Admin" have any form of control over our strategic nuclear arsenal. Especially now, when it's clear Biden isn't mentally fit to be in control of his own dinner menu, much less anything of real importance in the Fed Govt's arsenal.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OffGridGuy 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

What they mean by tactical nuclear weapon is one intended to be used on the battlefield, perhaps in close proximity to friendly forces, as opposed to strategic nuclear weapons which typically get used far from battlefields against industry, population centers, military bases, and possibly hardened defenses.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy