That’s because there’s nothing conservative about a law that makes it illegal to wear a mask SPECIFICALLY for privacy reasons. It allows people to wear masks for health reasons, it allows Muslim face coverings, it allows masks “for celebratory purposes” which could mean LITERALLY ANYTHING, it specifically does not target anyone you want to target and instead goes directly for the privacy of your very likeness.
Boy, I sure am glad there isn’t currently a revolution in the capability for anyone to easily turn a very small amount of data into very accurate fake footage, or this would seem really bad!
Oh! I should have read the details :) I thought it was some kind of sensible "no mask wearing allowed", instead of a leftist version. Now it makes sense for a county in NY :) I thought it referred to wearing masks outside, where it makes zero sense to wear one (I guess unless you have extreme pollen/dust problems) :)
That’s because there’s nothing conservative about a law that makes it illegal to wear a mask SPECIFICALLY for privacy reasons. It allows people to wear masks for health reasons, it allows Muslim face coverings, it allows masks “for celebratory purposes” which could mean LITERALLY ANYTHING, it specifically does not target anyone you want to target and instead goes directly for the privacy of your very likeness.
Boy, I sure am glad there isn’t currently a revolution in the capability for anyone to easily turn a very small amount of data into very accurate fake footage, or this would seem really bad!
Oh! I should have read the details :) I thought it was some kind of sensible "no mask wearing allowed", instead of a leftist version. Now it makes sense for a county in NY :) I thought it referred to wearing masks outside, where it makes zero sense to wear one (I guess unless you have extreme pollen/dust problems) :)