This is an honest question. I'm guessing that if/when he wins, they're going to try to secede, that is, the more liberal states, but then Trump will try and find ways to stop it, knowing that there are patriots in all 50 states and that they'll deem it unconstitutional, and to keep the nice, round number of 50.
And hopefully in the best case scenario, this will resolve the secession desires that we on the right understandably have because then Trump will be like, "no guys, we are tough and proud Americans, we don't go away from them, they'll go away from us!"
By the way, this is Q related, or something to consider as part of that scope.
The 2025-2028 period will see a restructuring of the United States, with the federal government getting much smaller and generally less important, and state/local power increasing.
No, DJT won't allow the states to break apart, but he will oversee them adopting a less centralized relationship than before.
The only state that might actually break away is Hawaii, but that is for historical and legal reasons. The overall number of states might increase, however, as U.S. statehood will look increasingly popular for the border provinces of Canada.
You understand how like it was me trying hard to describe it so that like he does fine line between "dictator" and ensuring there being no centralization?
They're not going to secede, unless they could immediately join an existing globalist nation, which would be impossible without a straight up war. They might rile their followers to demand it, but the whole idea of big government is to grow it, not shrink it. Bankrupting the country is an important step to forcing globalization, as is the destruction of culture, family, religion, privacy, and personal property
Seceding would set back a lot of work already completed in "red states," at a minimum.
I mean, the states themselves are basically little countries within one sphere. While we have the constitution as our overall base, there are things within each state that may not transfer to another. For example, Colorado and Missouri have legal medical and recreational cannabis available to purchase if you’re over 21. Kansas however, sitting in between those two states have no legal or recreational cannabis. So, while it may be legal to have it in Missouri, once you cross into Kansas you’re going under different laws. I believe each state should still be able to govern itself to a degree (within Constitutional Rights) but still have differences. If people want more legality, move to a more “blue” state. If you want more freedom, choose and more conservative state. Idk, I’m only in my early 30s so have had less time to observe things in the political/social realm.
I promote this. It will separate fed control and limit them back to the constitution.
If we roll back to pre-1871, that could take 13 states (everything after Nebraska, as shown here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_date_of_admission_to_the_Union) and revert them to territories.
I'm of the opinion that none of our state governments are legit, having been usurped in part if not entirely for at least a few decades, making them all manageable as territories for a time, at least enough time to build new governments from the ground up, state by state with elections managed by the armed forces, which is what I think they did with Iraq, and southern states under reconstruction.
This would also explain Trump's recent remarks about people not having to vote in federal elections after this next one. They'd still have to vote in state elections, but they won't be allowed to vote in federal elections until after the state is re-admitted, kind of like how reconstruction was managed. (Hopefully better this time.)
It also dovetails with the reports of the "new California" movement and similar movements in other states (WA, OR, ID, maybe others) that came up after 2020. The situation could let self-determination change a lot of those state borders, especially in the 13 states that hadn't been approved before the federal gov't was hijacked. I think the 37 states have their borders guaranteed, even if the gov'ts have to be re-established.
But I don't think it needs to be chaotic. Local police and especially elected sheriff departments can keep their jobs and maintain order, they'll just be supervised by the military, which in some states will be a big improvement. And order (more and better order, in cases like L.A. and Chicago) will also be directly maintained in places by US Marshals.
If any vets here on GAW have served in country-building ops, I'd be interested in your take on this.
I believe after the 500,000 indictments are served a lot of the problems will be resolved. We wont be dealing with child trafficking, pedophiles and illegals anymore. Treason will no longer be acceptable.
The left will never secede.
You think they would dissolve the FDA, the EPA, the FBI, the CIA, the CDC etc... all in one fell swoop. Nope.