"During a phone call with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the monarch said the “criminality” had been met by “the compassion and resilience of the many.”
Charles also spoke with police chiefs about the situation with policing over the past week.
Buckingham Palace spokesperson:
“This evening The King held a phone audience with the Prime Minister, and additionally had a joint call with the Chair of the National Police Chiefs' Council, Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, and UK Gold Commander Ben Harrington, Chief Constable of Essex.
In these calls, His Majesty was updated on the current situation and expressed his heartfelt thanks to the police and emergency services for all they are doing to restore peace in those areas that have been affected by violent disorder.”
There is no law prohibiting political comments by anyone in the royal family.
Chuck is a pedo simp & just ended the House of Windsor the like Charles I ended the House of Stuart. However, unlike Chuck I who fought Parliament, Chuck III is against the people.
Why do you think QE II wouldn't abdicate?
Sure knew both her sons are degenerates.
Walter Bagehot the writer of "The English Constitution" in 1867 gave the formulation that the Royal Family must be above party politics as their role is important for social cohesion. This was enshrined into parliamentary law at the reign of King George V, but not common law.
As the Houses of Parliament are a royal palace this is law, the decisions that are made there are made by MP's parliamentary law which can't be ignored. Its called the "cardinal convention" and prohibits the royals from speaking out about politics.
The "cardinal convention" is NOT enforceable (i.e. it is NOT a law) and mostly applies to MP's behaviour in Parliament.
As far as Chuckles is concerned, "The sovereign should not be involved in party politics in any way." He can say whatever he wants without favouring any political party. Since he gets to pick whoever he wants as PM in times of turmoil, that would count as favouring a political party.
NOTE: "should", NOT "shall not".
THEIR words, not mine: suggestions, NOT law.
If Chuckles cared about social cohesion, he'd fire the PM.
The Monarch cannot say whatever they want, except in private. This means the article this thread is based on is fake. He can't fire the PM, his only power is not to sign a bill into law, which means a general election has to be called, and the new government would probably dissolve the monarchy.
"During a phone call with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the monarch said the “criminality” had been met by “the compassion and resilience of the many.”
Charles also spoke with police chiefs about the situation with policing over the past week.
Buckingham Palace spokesperson:
“This evening The King held a phone audience with the Prime Minister, and additionally had a joint call with the Chair of the National Police Chiefs' Council, Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, and UK Gold Commander Ben Harrington, Chief Constable of Essex.
In these calls, His Majesty was updated on the current situation and expressed his heartfelt thanks to the police and emergency services for all they are doing to restore peace in those areas that have been affected by violent disorder.”
Is he in ill health or is he merely blushing because everyone knows Jimmy Savile was his best friend?
NO ONE out side of England cares or has ever cared what the 'king' thinks. The Crimes of the criminals that OWN the king is the crime.
Perfect example of a country that give up their GOD given rights for freedom and the right to own gun (s)
"the aggression and criminality from a few"
So he and the rest of the Royal family have been arrested ?
Whatever happened to his daughter in law?
He will suffer the same fate as Charles I.
He's one of the 300, of course he can't read the room.
Alternate story title:
No he didn't. He is not allowed to comment on political affairs at all and what the brit papers say about this is only what they made up.. Fake news.
There is no law prohibiting political comments by anyone in the royal family. Chuck is a pedo simp & just ended the House of Windsor the like Charles I ended the House of Stuart. However, unlike Chuck I who fought Parliament, Chuck III is against the people.
Why do you think QE II wouldn't abdicate? Sure knew both her sons are degenerates.
Walter Bagehot the writer of "The English Constitution" in 1867 gave the formulation that the Royal Family must be above party politics as their role is important for social cohesion. This was enshrined into parliamentary law at the reign of King George V, but not common law.
As the Houses of Parliament are a royal palace this is law, the decisions that are made there are made by MP's parliamentary law which can't be ignored. Its called the "cardinal convention" and prohibits the royals from speaking out about politics.
Nope.
The "cardinal convention" is NOT enforceable (i.e. it is NOT a law) and mostly applies to MP's behaviour in Parliament.
As far as Chuckles is concerned, "The sovereign should not be involved in party politics in any way." He can say whatever he wants without favouring any political party. Since he gets to pick whoever he wants as PM in times of turmoil, that would count as favouring a political party.
NOTE: "should", NOT "shall not".
THEIR words, not mine: suggestions, NOT law.
If Chuckles cared about social cohesion, he'd fire the PM.
The Monarch cannot say whatever they want, except in private. This means the article this thread is based on is fake. He can't fire the PM, his only power is not to sign a bill into law, which means a general election has to be called, and the new government would probably dissolve the monarchy.
Governors General of commonwealth countries have the same powers to fire the PM and dissolve Parliament.
Please continue to ignore laws which have been in effect for centuries.