Within this delegated jurisdiction, we are capable of sovereignty if we choose to claim it.
David was acknowledged as a king.
Is there something fundamentally different between him and we short of his willingness to subject himself to those responsibilities?
What makes a king (sovereign) a king?
How is God King of Kings if there are no sovereigns?
If there are sovereigns, and they just can’t be us, why are we not able to be kings when Revelation 1:6 says we are a nation of kings and priests?
What’s the missing context there?
I’m not a fan of the “name it and claim it” mindset - to my mind, it’s a false teaching -, but this is one area where it seems applicable in a more literal sense.
God is the King of Kings.
Sovereignty is subject to jurisdiction.
God’s jurisdiction is the highest.
Within this delegated jurisdiction, we are capable of sovereignty if we choose to claim it.
David was acknowledged as a king.
Is there something fundamentally different between him and we short of his willingness to subject himself to those responsibilities?
What makes a king (sovereign) a king?
How is God King of Kings if there are no sovereigns?
If there are sovereigns, and they just can’t be us, why are we not able to be kings when Revelation 1:6 says we are a nation of kings and priests?
What’s the missing context there?
I’m not a fan of the “name it and claim it” mindset - to my mind, it’s a false teaching -, but this is one area where it seems applicable in a more literal sense.
The Founding Fathers never called us sovereign.
We The People are sovereign.
But US citizens are not We The People.
You have to change your civil status to American State National/State Citizen in order to be part of We The People.
If we gave them authority, and their authority is admittedly delegated, then who is the sovereign in america?
Who “delegates/grants authority”, the king or the subject?