Three weeks ago, I posted on GAW about how I was trying to hold the California State Senate accountable to following the oath and bond laws: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tebrcPqw/i-have-served-the-california-sta/
I used Common Law. Step one was to serve the State Senate with a Notice of Legal Violation notifying them that Scott Wiener and others were working unlawfully without oaths/bonds, which I did in July: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Redacted-Notice-of-Legal-Violations-to-Senate-Committee.pdf.
For those that are unfamiliar with Scott Wiener, he has been aggressively pushing to erode parental rights and legalize pedophelia. He also blocks legislation intended to protect children.
Unsurprisingly, the State Senate did not have any of the people sign oaths/procure bonds. So on August 9, I executed step 2, which was a Writ of Quo Warranto: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Writ-of-Quo-Warranto-redacted.pdf
A Writ of Quo Warranto is essentially a notice for everyone without an oath to vacate office since they have no legal jurisdiction to be in office. I also demanded that Wiener's legislation be voided since he had no legal standing to make legislation and that Wiener be prosecuted since I had documented in the Notice of Legal Violations that he was intentionally working unlawfully (felony with 3-years in prison).
They had until yesterday to vacate office. Yesterday afternoon, I called and checked status on a few of the people. None of the people I checked on had left, including Wiener. In fact, in one of the offices that I called, the woman who answered the phone laughed at me. A giant, hearty laugh that clearly said that she believed they were above the law.
It is up to "we the people" to create a public humiliation campaign to force Scott Wiener and the others to resign. I am excited about this strategy because it is non-partisan. Most liberals shut off when you say Wiener is corrupt. In this strategy, even a liberal will ask "well, why won't you sign a promise to uphold the state and federal constitutions?"
Here are more details: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2822#more-2822
I did a follow up interviewed on a podcast a few days ago where I talked about the call in campaign: https://rumble.com/v5b7qbx-christi-grab-updates-americans-on-writ-of-quo-warranto-to-prosecute-scott-w.html
Please spread the word and also please continue to pray that me and my family are protected as the truth of the corruption comes out. Thank you!
What is the next step?
Step 3 is a Notice of Default. I'll start working on it next week.
Then after the Notice of Default, I notify the military and ask for intervention and notify the Attorney General and ask for intervention. I don't have high hopes for either.
My biggest hope is to keep encouraging parents to call in and demand that the State Senate comply with the laws. I think public pressure is the best venue.
Are these posted on your site?
Since this thread talked about multiple things, I am not sure which "these" you are asking about.
If you are asking about the Common Law stuff, here is the Step 3 that was served at the end of September: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2931
If you are asking about how to report government corruption to authorities, this is the info I have. Though, since I haven't seen any results from any of the reports I've made, I am dubious that anything happens with them. But hey, maybe all the reports will be picked up again when Trump is in office: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2909
I know it can be hard to find info on my site, so if you are looking for anything else, let me know and I will find you the correct link.
I’m still trying to learn these documents
The ones I saw listed are
In the interest of “local action”, say something happened like “we are going to build a government facility that costs millions of dollars, but doesn’t actually contain the tools needed to perform said government function, and thus we need to request funds to build a new government facility for the same function prior facility was supposed to be for, before prior facility is even completely constructed”
Seems like a good thing to file some sort of damages claim against and have someone removed from office for incompetence, with damages filed against their bonds.