But as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution:
Definition: In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the U.S., or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.[2]
Only the Constitutional definition counts. Biden has not levied war against the U.S., adhered to enemies, or given them aid and comfort. I think there is also a requirement that it be witnessed by two persons (this could be satisfied by public acts). If you can find that there was war being conducted against the U.S. by a foreign power and he obeyed or helped them, that would fit. But simply being a tyrant or corrupt office-holder would not satisfy the definition. So, no.
Who? Are we at war with them, or they with us? And by what acts witnessed, by whom? If you don't have verifiable answers to these tests, you ain't got nothin'.
Constitution, Article III, Section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
The dictionary definition:
treason
/trē′zən/
noun
a crime that undermines the offender's government
disloyalty by virtue of subversive behavior
an act of deliberate betrayal
But as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution:
Definition: In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the U.S., or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.[2]
Joes action meet both definitions.
Only the Constitutional definition counts. Biden has not levied war against the U.S., adhered to enemies, or given them aid and comfort. I think there is also a requirement that it be witnessed by two persons (this could be satisfied by public acts). If you can find that there was war being conducted against the U.S. by a foreign power and he obeyed or helped them, that would fit. But simply being a tyrant or corrupt office-holder would not satisfy the definition. So, no.
He most certainly has conspired with enemies of this nation.
Who? Are we at war with them, or they with us? And by what acts witnessed, by whom? If you don't have verifiable answers to these tests, you ain't got nothin'.
Constitution, Article III, Section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.