Unpasteurized used to kill people because of unsanitary conditions in the milking parlours, this is why laws came to be forcing dairy farmers to be a lot more responsible about cleanliness. But it seems that the Rothchilds took advantage of this to introduce their new "product"
I was thinking this, sounds like how improving sanitation, clean water, sewage disposal brought about the end of lots of disease, but Vaccination gets all the credit.
Bigger problem than unsanitary conditions are the health of the cows. A lot of the slop given to cows in feed lots in that era was stuff like spent leftover barley after it was used in beer making. Not exactly fit for proper consumption at that point and resulted in sick animals.
The natural ecosystem within raw milk keeps it sanitary and actively kills bacteria that gets into it, though cleanliness is still an important factor.
Listeria is what I believe they aim to kill, but all the beneficial bacteria that makes milk so nourishing and healing gets killed, too. I will always remember one podcast or radio show saying commercial pasteurized milk is almost like pus.
Pasteurization also destroys some B vitamins and Vitamin C that is present in raw milk. Enzymes too. Some people who are lactose intolerant can often stomach a little bit of raw milk.
Pasteurized milk has been heated (not boiled) to kill bacteria, mostly targeting e coli and salmonella. I believe those in favor of raw milk say it is healthier for you. I am uncertain as to why that is, hopefully someone here can help me out with this.
Raw milk is a fully living ecosystem on its own. There is no risk of disease if the cows were tended to properly and are healthy. There's been people who have put living e coli into a glass of fresh raw milk. The enzymes in the raw milk killed the bacteria in around fifteen minutes and was then safe to drink.
In pasteurized milk, the ecosystem has been entirely killed and has left it little more than a rotting petri dish for bacteria. Fully pasteurized milk is cooked, if I recall correctly, up to three times. One thing about pasteurized milk, is there's much less concern about the health of the cows as the treatment process boils, cooks, and kills EVERYTHING in the milk. Also, again providing I remember the stats right, up to 1/4th to 1/3rd of the milk may be PUSS produced by the cows because they are unhealthy and being forced to produce beyond their natural limits. During some of the processing, the puss separates from the milk and rather than remove it, it is put through an additional process that recombines it with the milk and gives it the nice white color again.
Absolutely. Also, pasteurized milk has another dark side. In raw milk there are enzymes that allow humans to digest it fully. Without that enzyme, digesting milk causes certain nutrients to be leeched out of our bones so the milk can be digested.
So yes completing where your mind may be going, osteoporosis, including in children, can actually be caused by drinking pasteurized milk. At the very least, your skeleton may become more brittle over all.
So, what's the 411 on pasteurized milk?
Unpasteurized used to kill people because of unsanitary conditions in the milking parlours, this is why laws came to be forcing dairy farmers to be a lot more responsible about cleanliness. But it seems that the Rothchilds took advantage of this to introduce their new "product"
I was thinking this, sounds like how improving sanitation, clean water, sewage disposal brought about the end of lots of disease, but Vaccination gets all the credit.
Bigger problem than unsanitary conditions are the health of the cows. A lot of the slop given to cows in feed lots in that era was stuff like spent leftover barley after it was used in beer making. Not exactly fit for proper consumption at that point and resulted in sick animals.
The natural ecosystem within raw milk keeps it sanitary and actively kills bacteria that gets into it, though cleanliness is still an important factor.
Distillers dried grains are still a widely used feed component. High in protein, fat, and fiber.
https://www.realmilk.com/
Listeria is what I believe they aim to kill, but all the beneficial bacteria that makes milk so nourishing and healing gets killed, too. I will always remember one podcast or radio show saying commercial pasteurized milk is almost like pus.
Pasteurization also destroys some B vitamins and Vitamin C that is present in raw milk. Enzymes too. Some people who are lactose intolerant can often stomach a little bit of raw milk.
Pasteurized milk has been heated (not boiled) to kill bacteria, mostly targeting e coli and salmonella. I believe those in favor of raw milk say it is healthier for you. I am uncertain as to why that is, hopefully someone here can help me out with this.
Raw milk is a fully living ecosystem on its own. There is no risk of disease if the cows were tended to properly and are healthy. There's been people who have put living e coli into a glass of fresh raw milk. The enzymes in the raw milk killed the bacteria in around fifteen minutes and was then safe to drink.
In pasteurized milk, the ecosystem has been entirely killed and has left it little more than a rotting petri dish for bacteria. Fully pasteurized milk is cooked, if I recall correctly, up to three times. One thing about pasteurized milk, is there's much less concern about the health of the cows as the treatment process boils, cooks, and kills EVERYTHING in the milk. Also, again providing I remember the stats right, up to 1/4th to 1/3rd of the milk may be PUSS produced by the cows because they are unhealthy and being forced to produce beyond their natural limits. During some of the processing, the puss separates from the milk and rather than remove it, it is put through an additional process that recombines it with the milk and gives it the nice white color again.
Thx for the info. Am I correct in assuming there is much more nutritional value in raw milk than in pasteurized milk?
Absolutely. Also, pasteurized milk has another dark side. In raw milk there are enzymes that allow humans to digest it fully. Without that enzyme, digesting milk causes certain nutrients to be leeched out of our bones so the milk can be digested.
So yes completing where your mind may be going, osteoporosis, including in children, can actually be caused by drinking pasteurized milk. At the very least, your skeleton may become more brittle over all.
So then anyone claiming raw milk confers a risk of c-coli infection is lying? Do you have any sauce on the claim raw milk enzymes kill e-coli?
https://www.naturalnews.com/026280_milk_raw_bacteria.html