Is this an accurate depiction of the Biblical blood lines?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Yes because the NT was written a millennium and a half after the OT. There is no way the NT authors tailored their book to match the OT. That would be gullible to believe.
Galatains is NT, my argument was Jesus was not called the seed in the OT. Not the bonus you think it is.
So you believe the Church is infallible and they would never use religion to control people, or edit the bible fo propaganda purposes in order to do so. What do you think they used to control people before m.s.m.?
You are conflating the "church" which is in a state of apostasy as foretold by the Apostle Paul and the writtings in the Bible. If Satan's greatest prize is to corrupt the hearts and minds of a believer than the "Church" is thee greatest place to do so.
Who assembled the Bible? Added, removed books, edited verses ect., pretty sure it was the Church. The Church created the Bible we read today. We at least agree the Church is evil.
There's a few different things to address here. As for the books found within the Bible, Yes I believe they were given under the direction of the Holy Spirit and therfore are solid. As for what we know as the canon, it may suprise you to know there are many books that were in the original 1611 KJV that aren't in today's modern translations. As far as my favorite apocryphal books (Enoch, Jebilees, and Jasher) there are some legitimate discrepancies in them and the reason they weren't included in the "western" Canon, however some were included in the Ethiopian Canon and aren't "hidden" in the sense you can't find them. I read them as a commentary in light of the canon and have gain much for it. Keep in mind the word of God has been under attack also from the beginning.
"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?"
As for the Church being Evil, I think this is an unfair generalization. Are there Evil people who've used the guise of Christianity or the Church to do horrible things, well of course but there are also Churches who do good in the community.
I think it wise that you stray from the original canon. I think it wiser that you study all religions. They are all telling the same story.
All cultures have a flood myth, their version of Noah. Greek, Mesopotamian, Hindu, Native American, ect. Most of the characters also, Lucifer is Prometheus in Greek history, Moses is Karna in Hinduism, Thutmose III in Egyptian and Sargon of Akkad in Sumerian just to name a couple. Our true history is being hidden from us and the Catholic Church is the main culprit.
The reason for the Church is to keep the other religions separate (compartmentalized) to create conflict and war of the self-righteous. To spawn hate and fear by demonizing other religions by calling them pagan, or myth, or evil, or eradicating them altogether (Mayan, Gnostic, ect.). So people will be scared and apprehensive of learning about other religions and finding the truth. Exactly like the Democratic Party does by dividing people into categories to create conflict and demonize the other side, its the same playbook.
Is it the Church doing good in the communities or is it human nature? Because I can think of a lot of organizations that do good in the community but are in no way related to a church. Sure there are good people in the church, Im sure there are good people in the Democratic Party that doesn't mean Im going to align myself with it. I just find them misguided.