Chat GPT can be incredibly unreliable in many sensitive topics such as this. It has been programmed to lean highly to the left and overqualify anything remotely controversial.
I would recommend going with gab.ai and specifically use one of the "characters" That would give you the original interpretation and intent of our foundational documents such as the Thomas Jefferson character
https://gab.ai/g/65b8311dccea4c861b59b2e8
I agree the state shouldn't be enforcing non-judicial religious beliefs. But all morality is based on something and our laws are either based upon the perfect righteousness of God's law or they are based upon the ever-changing whims of secular society. Personally I like the ground I stand on to be firm and unchanging.
But on the flip side none of the laws of our nation should be in conflict with the moral and judicial law of God. (This is not to be confused with things like the holiness code or instructions for believers, This would be like the laws insurance that applied to anyone within the land to or gentile, like no murdering, theft, rape, stealing land, slavery, etc)
...while individual states have some latitude to govern their own affairs, including the potential to enact laws that may reflect religious beliefs, they are still bound by the Constitution. Any state law that establishes a specific religion, enforces religious practices, or discriminates against individuals based on their religious beliefs would likely be challenged in court as unconstitutional.
Do you at least agree with this part? Also I'm pretty sure all of God's laws are already codified so we don't need more of them. What we need is to ENFORCE them, and also to get rid of a ton of unconstitutional ones. And we certainly don't need to add Sunday laws.
Again I've already completely disagreed with the Sunday laws. That doesn't align with scripture. Period.
Sabbath isn't a judicial law in scripture at all.
That being said I completely disagree with that AI or otherwise modern interpretation. That applies only to the federal government and should and likely will be rolled back. If a state wants to vote in Christian values and standards, that's up to that state and not the scope of the federal government to interfere with.
Keep in mind it's the federal government that told states that they have to allow the murder of unborn children despite what their constituents closely held religious or moral beliefs wanted.
And yes we do need a complete tear down and simplification of modern laws an actual enforcing of the foundational laws and structure that made this country what it was.
Chat GPT can be incredibly unreliable in many sensitive topics such as this. It has been programmed to lean highly to the left and overqualify anything remotely controversial.
I would recommend going with gab.ai and specifically use one of the "characters" That would give you the original interpretation and intent of our foundational documents such as the Thomas Jefferson character https://gab.ai/g/65b8311dccea4c861b59b2e8
I agree the state shouldn't be enforcing non-judicial religious beliefs. But all morality is based on something and our laws are either based upon the perfect righteousness of God's law or they are based upon the ever-changing whims of secular society. Personally I like the ground I stand on to be firm and unchanging.
But on the flip side none of the laws of our nation should be in conflict with the moral and judicial law of God. (This is not to be confused with things like the holiness code or instructions for believers, This would be like the laws insurance that applied to anyone within the land to or gentile, like no murdering, theft, rape, stealing land, slavery, etc)
Do you at least agree with this part? Also I'm pretty sure all of God's laws are already codified so we don't need more of them. What we need is to ENFORCE them, and also to get rid of a ton of unconstitutional ones. And we certainly don't need to add Sunday laws.
Again I've already completely disagreed with the Sunday laws. That doesn't align with scripture. Period. Sabbath isn't a judicial law in scripture at all.
That being said I completely disagree with that AI or otherwise modern interpretation. That applies only to the federal government and should and likely will be rolled back. If a state wants to vote in Christian values and standards, that's up to that state and not the scope of the federal government to interfere with.
Keep in mind it's the federal government that told states that they have to allow the murder of unborn children despite what their constituents closely held religious or moral beliefs wanted.
And yes we do need a complete tear down and simplification of modern laws an actual enforcing of the foundational laws and structure that made this country what it was.
That does not include any laws about Sundays.