Oh two people liked your post. Whoopee doo. I promise you you will be on the wrong side of the Telegram argument when all is said and done. You do not know me, you do not know what i do and do not know what i know. Telegram is black hat asshole. You will be eating your shitty comments. I am not interested in arguing with someone that supports Telegram, a platform that enables AND facilitates chd exploitation and terrorism. I am 100% for free speech and protected speech. I fought for that right. As I said and have continued to say both can be true at the same time: free, protected and private speech AND eliminating child porn. Just because Pavel was interviewed by Tucker does not make Pavel a white hat, not at all. His is not the next Asange.
Nice straw-man. IDGAF about telegram in particular. I care about the right to have private conversations and citizens to use encryption and other technologies legally without being considered criminals. I believe in the Constitution and I'm a hardcore libertarian and a Christian theonymous otherwise known as Christian nationalist.
Do you use cash? How about hotels? Do you ever whisper? You enable and support crime and terrorism and child exploitation.
I'm all for eliminating child porn and terrorism but not at the cost of any rights, freedoms, or liberties. That's the guys of totalitarianism and oppression.
A person that's willing to give up liberty for safety deserves neither and is denied both.
Did I say he was a white hat? No. Again another straw man fallacy.
You frankly suck at this. Why don't you head down to your local community college and take a debate class or sign up for one online. You really need to brush up on your ability to think logically.
Inconsistency is the sign of a failed argument and you sir, are inconsistent.
Oh two people liked your post. Whoopee doo. I promise you you will be on the wrong side of the Telegram argument when all is said and done. You do not know me, you do not know what i do and do not know what i know. Telegram is black hat asshole. You will be eating your shitty comments. I am not interested in arguing with someone that supports Telegram, a platform that enables AND facilitates chd exploitation and terrorism. I am 100% for free speech and protected speech. I fought for that right. As I said and have continued to say both can be true at the same time: free, protected and private speech AND eliminating child porn. Just because Pavel was interviewed by Tucker does not make Pavel a white hat, not at all. His is not the next Asange.
Lol 2 people 😂🤣😂🤣 Scroll up retard.
Nice straw-man. IDGAF about telegram in particular. I care about the right to have private conversations and citizens to use encryption and other technologies legally without being considered criminals. I believe in the Constitution and I'm a hardcore libertarian and a Christian theonymous otherwise known as Christian nationalist.
Do you use cash? How about hotels? Do you ever whisper? You enable and support crime and terrorism and child exploitation.
I'm all for eliminating child porn and terrorism but not at the cost of any rights, freedoms, or liberties. That's the guys of totalitarianism and oppression.
A person that's willing to give up liberty for safety deserves neither and is denied both.
Did I say he was a white hat? No. Again another straw man fallacy.
You frankly suck at this. Why don't you head down to your local community college and take a debate class or sign up for one online. You really need to brush up on your ability to think logically.
Inconsistency is the sign of a failed argument and you sir, are inconsistent.
Good day you dumb POS.