The Fourth Circuit ignores Bruen again
(www.americanthinker.com)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
This will continue as long as there are no consequences for those enacting these laws and the courts that unconstitutionally uphold them.
They have nothing to lose with these tactics and they are happy to fight it out in court while draining individual's finances and delaying any changes.
They almost certainly have alternate, equally abusive laws in the pipeline knowing they will be ruled unconstitutional.
Their attitude is "so what are you going to do about it".
...you have a firm grasp of the situational reality....
Where in the 2nd amendment is that written?
Enter 18 USC241/242: A right protected by the Constitution ....
So, someone exercising this is, does so lawfully, as the Constitution protects it, and the government is prohibited from probing into it as a requirement to enjoy such a right.
Not to mention, certain people who pretend to be something they are not due to authorization, and conspiracy to deprive
added: Then the Historical analogue - test.
Nope. The 2nd does not warrant such a view, as it clearly says: this right SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
The historical analogue infringes ( en fringes, or puts a fringe around such a right) the free exercise of a right.
In effect, if you want to play with guns, you should be able to, and if you do not want to learn from the better handlers, than yeah, you may become liable for stupid use.
...exactly...
Need to start filing 42 USC 1983 lawsuits
Section 1983 provides an individual the right to sue state government employees and others acting "under color of state law" for civil rights violations. Section 1983 does not provide civil rights; it is a means to enforce civil rights that already exist.
https://archive.ph/wip/S3vCA
It is the one best way to put a chilling affect on individuals by suing them in their personal capacity. The more people do it, the more they will stop abusing their power when there are consequences, whether followed through and won or not.