Not to draw too fine a point on what you said, but national socialism is different from marxist socialism. Hitler went to great length to describe the differences, among them, Germans owned private property.
It's often not accurate to try to compare the NSDAP to socialistic practices of today. It was a different time then, and the world was just beginning to explore types of progressive government differing from monarchies and autocracies. What worked then wouldn't work today, but that period of Germany worked so well they became a successful nation following the Weimar Republic...while the rest of the developed world struggled in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
I think your implication is that government working in concert with large corporations is similar to what is happening today...with tech companies doing the government's bidding to silence unwanted speech. Nothing like that happened in Germany during that time (of course there weren't high-tech firms or the internet like today). Such an action would be unquestionably a negative partnership to harm citizens and gain control of the populace...and, yes, I understand the point you're trying to make.
Germany did its best to silence the propaganda coming from the jewish-owned press, because it was intentionally devised to demoralize the German people and create a negative perception of Germany and Hitler to sway public opinion in the world. But the best Germany could do was counter with positive messaging to encourage the German people and build pride and patriotism.
Since the mark had become worthless because of policies from the Treaty of Versailles and manipulation during the Weimar Republic, Hitler had to find a new basis for Germany's currency. He settled on labor. This is why the German government worked with companies, to build on that system of labor to stabilize and grow the economy. The results were nothing short of staggering, and it was a positive partnership to rebuild the nation from the ashes.
Again, would something like this work today? No, but it was the right decision for the time given the circumstances.
I didn't mean to sidetrack your thread. I just wanted to point out the differences in types of socialism. I haven't watched any of the shows you linked to, but I can imagine that they are disgusting works of fiction meant as further propaganda against Germany. As long as the cabal can keep the "evil Germany" lies going, they can continue to hide. Many folks shrug their shoulders about discussions having to do with WWII, claiming it doesn't matter. However, IMO, it's the keystone in exposing the true enemies of the world, with plenty of documentation and evidence for those willing to see.
No, its a very good conversation. These days you just labelled a racist, fasist etc if you try and discuss topics like this. The media is the main problem these days.
Not to draw too fine a point on what you said, but national socialism is different from marxist socialism. Hitler went to great length to describe the differences, among them, Germans owned private property.
It's often not accurate to try to compare the NSDAP to socialistic practices of today. It was a different time then, and the world was just beginning to explore types of progressive government differing from monarchies and autocracies. What worked then wouldn't work today, but that period of Germany worked so well they became a successful nation following the Weimar Republic...while the rest of the developed world struggled in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
I know, the main difference is that Hitler used big business as an extension of Govt policy, they were working together.
Now does that remind you of anything?
I think your implication is that government working in concert with large corporations is similar to what is happening today...with tech companies doing the government's bidding to silence unwanted speech. Nothing like that happened in Germany during that time (of course there weren't high-tech firms or the internet like today). Such an action would be unquestionably a negative partnership to harm citizens and gain control of the populace...and, yes, I understand the point you're trying to make.
Germany did its best to silence the propaganda coming from the jewish-owned press, because it was intentionally devised to demoralize the German people and create a negative perception of Germany and Hitler to sway public opinion in the world. But the best Germany could do was counter with positive messaging to encourage the German people and build pride and patriotism.
Since the mark had become worthless because of policies from the Treaty of Versailles and manipulation during the Weimar Republic, Hitler had to find a new basis for Germany's currency. He settled on labor. This is why the German government worked with companies, to build on that system of labor to stabilize and grow the economy. The results were nothing short of staggering, and it was a positive partnership to rebuild the nation from the ashes.
Again, would something like this work today? No, but it was the right decision for the time given the circumstances.
I didn't mean to sidetrack your thread. I just wanted to point out the differences in types of socialism. I haven't watched any of the shows you linked to, but I can imagine that they are disgusting works of fiction meant as further propaganda against Germany. As long as the cabal can keep the "evil Germany" lies going, they can continue to hide. Many folks shrug their shoulders about discussions having to do with WWII, claiming it doesn't matter. However, IMO, it's the keystone in exposing the true enemies of the world, with plenty of documentation and evidence for those willing to see.
No, its a very good conversation. These days you just labelled a racist, fasist etc if you try and discuss topics like this. The media is the main problem these days.
Almost is as we were supposed to repeat the same cycle here after 2008 part 2