I like Bongino, but I still get the feeling sometimes that he is a top level tiered gate keeper. I have listened to quite a few of his podcasts since the assassination attempt. He raises his fist and pounds the table about all of the things the SS did, but ultimately blames it on their incompetency. He never mentions or alludes to the SS being complicit with the assassination attempt.
It was SS that pressured three doctors at Parkland hospital in Dallas to change their medical opinions. Two stated the back of JFKs head were exit wounds and the third Doctor stated he saw a small entry wound in JFKs throat. Someone shot from the front and their goes the Govts narrative.
You are not reading what i am saying. Being shot from the front is not only consistent with entry wounds in the back of the head, it would be expected. A third wound from the front would only be one more wound. I don't see that it explodes any theory of anything.
By the way, I used to be a member of the International Wound Ballistics Association. Their journal once conducted an independent analysis of the government report of the Kennedy assassination and concluded that the given conclusions were correct based on the forensic evidence. There were a number of peculiarities that were resolved on deeper analysis.
I like Bongino, but I still get the feeling sometimes that he is a top level tiered gate keeper. I have listened to quite a few of his podcasts since the assassination attempt. He raises his fist and pounds the table about all of the things the SS did, but ultimately blames it on their incompetency. He never mentions or alludes to the SS being complicit with the assassination attempt.
It was SS that pressured three doctors at Parkland hospital in Dallas to change their medical opinions. Two stated the back of JFKs head were exit wounds and the third Doctor stated he saw a small entry wound in JFKs throat. Someone shot from the front and their goes the Govts narrative.
If someone shot from the front, the exit wounds would be in the back of the head. The smallness of the throat wound might have been discordant.
The one Doctor stood still by his claim later.
You are not reading what i am saying. Being shot from the front is not only consistent with entry wounds in the back of the head, it would be expected. A third wound from the front would only be one more wound. I don't see that it explodes any theory of anything.
By the way, I used to be a member of the International Wound Ballistics Association. Their journal once conducted an independent analysis of the government report of the Kennedy assassination and concluded that the given conclusions were correct based on the forensic evidence. There were a number of peculiarities that were resolved on deeper analysis.