I don't have twitter, but I would always read Trump's posts back in the day (before he was banned). You would ALWAYS see a krassenstein post, or a post from some "doctor" that I can't remember their name, as the very first post when looking at responses. (Wish X let you view responses without an account)
Very often they would respond within seconds of President Trump's post, but even then I believe twitter was boosting their response. NO way that was coincidence..
The only thing about this that's surprising is that it's "porn" and not "child porn" (although whatever this is is very close), as that seems to be the dems modus operandi
The site domains refer to 17 year olds, which in the U.S. would be very, very illegal even with age of consent at 16 in many states.
I'm sure we are far from the only country that retain an 18+ requirement for circulating nudes on the internet. Should they have wanted to do business here, they would have been breaking laws.
I don't have twitter, but I would always read Trump's posts back in the day (before he was banned). You would ALWAYS see a krassenstein post, or a post from some "doctor" that I can't remember their name, as the very first post when looking at responses. (Wish X let you view responses without an account)
Very often they would respond within seconds of President Trump's post, but even then I believe twitter was boosting their response. NO way that was coincidence..
The only thing about this that's surprising is that it's "porn" and not "child porn" (although whatever this is is very close), as that seems to be the dems modus operandi
In the eyes of the law, it would be child porn.
The site domains refer to 17 year olds, which in the U.S. would be very, very illegal even with age of consent at 16 in many states.
I'm sure we are far from the only country that retain an 18+ requirement for circulating nudes on the internet. Should they have wanted to do business here, they would have been breaking laws.
Not to mention it's just icky.