Make Closets Great Again!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
Is it a lie for a pedo to not attack a child? or is it them resisting an evil urge?
As I clearly stated, I'm not defending bad behavior. I'm talking about your average gay person who wants to life a quiet life and be left alone. The idea of "closeting" that person is equivalent to forcing them to lie.
I'm gay, and pedos make me sick too. Totally on board with that. But there's no equivalence to the gay population in general.
If the average gay person wants a quiet life and to be left alone then quit shoving the shit in our faces.. I don't care if you're gay, I really don't have an issue with it.. but we don't need the parades of degeneracy, debauchery and sexualization of EVERYTHING.
You give these fucks an inch and they take a mile. That's why you suppress that. Hence, the closet.
The average gay person does exactly that. It's the activists who are a problem. I agree that the parades you mention are inappropriate since about 2010.
Maybe they might consider repentance rather than lying?
I said the same thing too just now lol. It seems like this guy is against personal accountability.
I don't understand the lack of reading comprehension. Did I not explicitly state that I'm not defending bad behavior? I am accountable to God. I am not accountable to you.
Having spent 20 years of my life attempting to "repent," I can assure you that's not how it works. The attempt did help me build a relationship with God, though, until such time as it sunk in that He accepts me based on my heart, not based on the arbitrary standards of man.
But thanks for the advice.
Edit: BTW, you're going to want to say that it's not the standards of man, it's the standards of God, because the Bible says so. I advise against that, I know more about it than you do. Unless you really want to be educated as to how exactly the Bible, when understood without the lens of tradition or dogma, says nothing in condemnation of homosexuality. I've had that argument so many times I can copypasta it.
Umm Leviticus 20:13?
Can we deconstruct your statement? If an average gay person wants to live a quiet life and be left alone, then how would you hear about it? I don't know how many gay people you know, but I know hundreds. Only a handful were so insecure as to be activists. But those are the ones that YOU are likely to see.
Gays don't have to reproduce. It's an epigenetic expression during fetal development. Gays are born and always will be. We can unpack that if you'd like.
There are definitely problems in the gay community. I'd hazard the theory that we'd see a lot less of those problems if gays didn't feel the pressure to repress themselves. Repressed sexuality regularly leads to an eventual explosion of bad behavior.
Well since gays were tolerated in every empire of antiquity, that isn't a particularly compelling argument. You may as well argue that eating grain causes empires to collapse. Tell me, which empires were intolerant of gays and survived?
Do you really think that societal-ending hedonism is limited to gays? I'd suggest poking your head into the world if so. It's not gay people who are jumping into DNC abortion vans or becoming single mothers.
yes there is an equivalence both actions are detestable and dont build a society both should be controlled by the individual
Thanks for your opinion, now kindly fuck off.
Objectively true, and it seems your actual original disagreement. Be careful not to let emotion and physical desire cloud your judgement, it never ends well.