You know what's funny, Kamala is probably directly involved in that, at least during the time she was California AG between 2011 and 2017.
AI initial search:
During the period from 2011 to 2017, some notable allegations included:
2012 Presidential Election: Following the election, various groups raised concerns about voter impersonation, but investigations found no evidence of widespread fraud.
2014 Election Concerns: There were accusations related to ballot harvesting, especially in relation to absentee ballots, but these were not substantiated with credible evidence.
2016 Presidential Election: Some individuals claimed irregularities regarding the registration of voters, particularly concerning non-citizens voting. However, numerous investigations by state and local officials found no evidence to support these claims.
General Claims of Voting Irregularities: Throughout this period, there were numerous allegations related to vote-by-mail ballots and issues like double voting, but comprehensive audits and studies generally confirmed the integrity of the voting process.
more
California Secretary of State Reports: The California Secretary of State's office periodically publishes reports on election integrity. While these reports may note isolated instances of potential fraud—such as a small number of cases involving fraudulent registrations—these numbers are typically low relative to the overall number of votes cast.
Voter Registration Issues: In the lead-up to the 2016 election, there were reports of duplicate registrations and issues with outreach to certain populations, such as students. Some claims suggested that this could lead to potential fraud, but investigations showed these were generally administrative errors rather than malicious attempts at fraud.
Ballot Harvesting Controversies: In the 2016 election cycle, the concept of ballot harvesting gained attention, especially in relation to the absentee voting process. Reports of individuals collecting and submitting ballots on behalf of others sparked debates about potential vulnerabilities in the system. However, California passed laws to regulate this practice, and no significant evidence of fraud due to ballot harvesting was established.
Claims of Non-Citizen Voting: Some groups raised concerns about non-citizens registering or voting in elections. Investigations typically concluded that while there were isolated incidents, they did not reflect a pattern of widespread fraud. In fact, voter registration checks in California include measures to verify citizenship.
2017 Special Elections: Following the 2016 election, there were various claims about voter fraud in some special elections. However, most allegations lacked substantiation, and state officials reiterated the security measures in place to prevent fraud.
Public Misinformation Campaigns: Various misinformation campaigns have circulated, particularly on social media, suggesting higher rates of fraud than exist. These campaigns often cite unverified anecdotes and have been consistently debunked by authorities.
The 2016 Presidential Election: The day after the 2016 election, there were widespread allegations from various commentators and social media that the outcome was influenced by voting irregularities. However, extensive post-election analysis, including audits in certain jurisdictions, found little evidence to substantiate these claims.
Allegations of Coercion or Intimidation: Some allegations were made about voter intimidation, particularly in certain communities. Election monitors and local election officials investigated these claims, though they typically concluded that while intimidation attempts may have occurred, they were not widespread and did not affect the overall election results.
Focus on Local Elections: Many of the allegations have come from local elections where outcomes were close and scrutinized more heavily. In some instances, minor irregularities were noted (e.g., missing signatures on ballots), but these did not substantiate widespread fraud claims.
Overall, while allegations of election fraud can arise from various sources, credible evidence supporting widespread electoral fraud in California during the 2011-2017 period remains minimal. The state's election process has been recognized for its robustness and the safeguards designed to ensure fairness and accuracy. For specific incidents or cases, examining court records, state reports, and local media coverage from that time would provide a clearer picture. (KEK at the cope from ChatGPT)
I bet that stank ho is sweating bullets being in such a spotlight right now...
It always was, dems know how to cheat
You know what's funny, Kamala is probably directly involved in that, at least during the time she was California AG between 2011 and 2017.
AI initial search:
During the period from 2011 to 2017, some notable allegations included:
2012 Presidential Election: Following the election, various groups raised concerns about voter impersonation, but investigations found no evidence of widespread fraud.
2014 Election Concerns: There were accusations related to ballot harvesting, especially in relation to absentee ballots, but these were not substantiated with credible evidence.
2016 Presidential Election: Some individuals claimed irregularities regarding the registration of voters, particularly concerning non-citizens voting. However, numerous investigations by state and local officials found no evidence to support these claims.
General Claims of Voting Irregularities: Throughout this period, there were numerous allegations related to vote-by-mail ballots and issues like double voting, but comprehensive audits and studies generally confirmed the integrity of the voting process.
more
California Secretary of State Reports: The California Secretary of State's office periodically publishes reports on election integrity. While these reports may note isolated instances of potential fraud—such as a small number of cases involving fraudulent registrations—these numbers are typically low relative to the overall number of votes cast.
Voter Registration Issues: In the lead-up to the 2016 election, there were reports of duplicate registrations and issues with outreach to certain populations, such as students. Some claims suggested that this could lead to potential fraud, but investigations showed these were generally administrative errors rather than malicious attempts at fraud.
Ballot Harvesting Controversies: In the 2016 election cycle, the concept of ballot harvesting gained attention, especially in relation to the absentee voting process. Reports of individuals collecting and submitting ballots on behalf of others sparked debates about potential vulnerabilities in the system. However, California passed laws to regulate this practice, and no significant evidence of fraud due to ballot harvesting was established.
Claims of Non-Citizen Voting: Some groups raised concerns about non-citizens registering or voting in elections. Investigations typically concluded that while there were isolated incidents, they did not reflect a pattern of widespread fraud. In fact, voter registration checks in California include measures to verify citizenship.
2017 Special Elections: Following the 2016 election, there were various claims about voter fraud in some special elections. However, most allegations lacked substantiation, and state officials reiterated the security measures in place to prevent fraud.
Public Misinformation Campaigns: Various misinformation campaigns have circulated, particularly on social media, suggesting higher rates of fraud than exist. These campaigns often cite unverified anecdotes and have been consistently debunked by authorities.
The 2016 Presidential Election: The day after the 2016 election, there were widespread allegations from various commentators and social media that the outcome was influenced by voting irregularities. However, extensive post-election analysis, including audits in certain jurisdictions, found little evidence to substantiate these claims.
Allegations of Coercion or Intimidation: Some allegations were made about voter intimidation, particularly in certain communities. Election monitors and local election officials investigated these claims, though they typically concluded that while intimidation attempts may have occurred, they were not widespread and did not affect the overall election results.
Focus on Local Elections: Many of the allegations have come from local elections where outcomes were close and scrutinized more heavily. In some instances, minor irregularities were noted (e.g., missing signatures on ballots), but these did not substantiate widespread fraud claims.
Overall, while allegations of election fraud can arise from various sources, credible evidence supporting widespread electoral fraud in California during the 2011-2017 period remains minimal. The state's election process has been recognized for its robustness and the safeguards designed to ensure fairness and accuracy. For specific incidents or cases, examining court records, state reports, and local media coverage from that time would provide a clearer picture. (KEK at the cope from ChatGPT)
I bet that stank ho is sweating bullets being in such a spotlight right now...