Do Big Tech Billionaires Promote “Free Speech” or Child Sex Trafficking? What is “Free Speech”?
With the constant flow of articles I continue to see in my news feed each day with Americans bemoaning the loss of what they call "free speech" as they idolize their favorite Big Tech Billionaires, I want to highlight some facts in this article about these...
This is quite true of this site, GAW is not free speech.
X and GAW have been freer than most. Try others. I have.
Free speech is a misnomer. Nothing is ever truly "free."
The author is correct, though, in that the Bill of Rights only protects us against governmental tyranny, not privately owned corps(es) deciding how best to run their companies. Including this one. I really don't care if any privately held corp(se) decides to make rules that inhibit what one can say. That's their right under the U.S. Constitution. This fairly recent push to label anything and everything as an infrnlingmenet on someone's rights is all just a push to garner more power for those who already rule over us with an iron hand.
I was recently given a ban for what I assume was something that offended someone (probably a mod I offended, or one of the many sidebarred rules we have here), and I really don't care about what it was I said. It was my right to say it, and equally the mod's right to ban me for 3 days for the offense. I took that lump, didn't complain, and here I am, back again to say what I will and possibly suffer the consequence. I didn't even attempt to contact any mods to try to argue my position. First, because I reply to a bunch of posts here and really didn't know what it was I said that could've been construed as offensive, nor did I care to trace back thru the hundreds of comments I've made over the last few years. (What's already been said has been said and can't be taken back, so why bother arguing with someone who's principled enough to back themselves up by handing out a 3-day ban for an offending comment?) Second, our speech here isn't free (there are always consequences for actions taken, even if we can't see them at the time we commit an offense) and I understood that when I came here right after VOAT died. VOAT was about the freest place on the Internet at the time, next to the chans, and even it had censorship rules everyone had to follow. Why should GAW be any different?
People have become too pussified over the last 40 yrs, and it shows.
Mods, good on you guys for policing this site like you do. Truly, kudos to you for doing a thankless and tiring job, keeping us together and on our toes, and handing out punishments when it's warranted. Keep it up. It's a big reason why I keep coming back and is about the only site I regularly make comments on.
When internet first shows up and the chat rooms were opened, I went in there to look and see what is happening and the chat rooms were free for all without any type of censorship (or so it seems).
Did you know how offensive the people in there were? They acted like bunch of animals as far as I am concerned.
The Big Tech Billionaires promote whatever they are told to promote.
That's how they were allowed to become Big Tech Billionaires.
Absolutely correct
u/brain_dead Excuse me anon,but do child trafficking is wireless or done trough the wires ?
OR: they KIDNAP some kids and rape or/& kill&eat them ? Or abuse such way their own kids. And government do nothing or even support it.
Questions asked not without reason !
Also - WHY EXACTLY Zuckerberg is NOT attacked for supporting child trafficking ?
Not to mention the author says:
You know when exactly I was near being atheist ? When I were stupid kid who almost believed in leftist shit. Beware godless ones with minds too open as:
Open mind is unguarded one.
I'll bet it's done through both wireless and the wires. They talk in codes.
I was so open minded that I actually supported the left for the longest time until Obama's 2nd term (that's when I actually wake up), hence brain-dead.
oh. No offence (ok lie here - big offence) but it isn't still alive enough fren.
Using communicators = They talk not do.
Thing is: if it is about eliminating human trafficking why they want to silence Elon Musk and Pavel Durov ?
Blade of free speech is double edged. Yes, paedophiles communicating freely are the problem,but people talking about them and wanting them arrested being silenced or even monitored by paedophiles - oh, that's MUCH,MUCH bigger problem !
The government strong enough to give you anything you want is the one able to take everything you have and love.
If it wouldn't be beneficial to WEF and rest of the cabal they would like to change the west to fully libertarian society - not such one like communist China. System which generates "elites" total control above us all creates "elites" impunity
The real disturbing fact is speech on X and on Telegram IS NOT really free,not it being "too free".
Yes,currently I am still trusting the plan,but I am NOT trusting kind of person. As the key to freedom and safety is being watchful and critical - forever.
They all work for Satan. All I can say is, if it doesn't benefit them (as in moving toward the one-world-order under Satan), then you are in the way.