What I DON'T see is any method to take one's memories with the soul; without the physical brain, there isn't any mechanism for that in the theory (unless I've missed something).
That is such a great point u/Narg and I'm glad you brought that up because John Titor actually talked about it specifically on two separate occasions:
Jan 26th, 2001:
"Since the existence of multiple universes is a reality from my viewpoint, please allow me to disclose an idea we toss around a bit in 2036. Since all possibilities, outcomes and events are occurring and exist simultaneously; it would mean there are multiple universes out there where “you” are living a day behind and a day ahead of the “you” on this universe.
There are some who believe that memory is some sort of information transfer or communication with the “yous” in the past, across worldlines or universes. Although this is seemingly quite ridiculous, if you think that could be true, then physics tells us that the same information transfer from our future selves on other worldlines is not only possible but certain. Could it be that fantasy or “what if” scenarios are actually future memory from an alternate “us” on a future worldline?"
Feb 2nd, 2001:
"There is also an area of thought that maintains all of the “yous” out there will make up the “you” that eventually returns to God. In that manner, it is frustrating to know that you are capable of and acting on all of the thoughts and ideas you have regardless of what the “you” hear is doing. How good or evil do you think you can be?
There is even an idea (supported in physics apparently but I have a hard time with this one) that there is some sort of communication going on between all of the “yous” that are out there. Some people think that memories, intuition and conscious are actually attempts by one version of “you” to talk to another."
The idea that everything possible becomes real is at the core of the multiverse idea, and it DOES solve a lot of interesting problems. It may be that we cannot comprehend the full nature of "real" -- the multiverse idea has adherents and opponents among physicists, as you know -- but as I said the idea just doesn't work for me. Then again, perhaps another version of me in another 'verse has other ideas . . .
That is such a great point u/Narg and I'm glad you brought that up because John Titor actually talked about it specifically on two separate occasions:
Jan 26th, 2001:
"Since the existence of multiple universes is a reality from my viewpoint, please allow me to disclose an idea we toss around a bit in 2036. Since all possibilities, outcomes and events are occurring and exist simultaneously; it would mean there are multiple universes out there where “you” are living a day behind and a day ahead of the “you” on this universe. There are some who believe that memory is some sort of information transfer or communication with the “yous” in the past, across worldlines or universes. Although this is seemingly quite ridiculous, if you think that could be true, then physics tells us that the same information transfer from our future selves on other worldlines is not only possible but certain. Could it be that fantasy or “what if” scenarios are actually future memory from an alternate “us” on a future worldline?"
Feb 2nd, 2001:
"There is also an area of thought that maintains all of the “yous” out there will make up the “you” that eventually returns to God. In that manner, it is frustrating to know that you are capable of and acting on all of the thoughts and ideas you have regardless of what the “you” hear is doing. How good or evil do you think you can be?
There is even an idea (supported in physics apparently but I have a hard time with this one) that there is some sort of communication going on between all of the “yous” that are out there. Some people think that memories, intuition and conscious are actually attempts by one version of “you” to talk to another."
Source:
https://temporalrecon.wordpress.com/the-titor-posts/
The idea that everything possible becomes real is at the core of the multiverse idea, and it DOES solve a lot of interesting problems. It may be that we cannot comprehend the full nature of "real" -- the multiverse idea has adherents and opponents among physicists, as you know -- but as I said the idea just doesn't work for me. Then again, perhaps another version of me in another 'verse has other ideas . . .
+1
Hahaha u/Narg that last line was great! Agree or disagree, I Thank you for giving your input here!
Thank you also, John. I love having people here who I can discuss such things with.