CORRECT, even SPERM ITSELF (no fetus) has big effects!!!!!
Not too many scientists feel welcome on GA, but I owe it to the community to chime in and say this post is correct.
Weird cell changes from mere sperm effects exist.
Females with NO sons and in fact no embryos of any kind EVER, have DNA in their bodies and brains from Men's SPERM ALONE!!!!
10% of nulligravid (never pregnant) females PROVEN to have male DNA in their bodies in large numbers of cells : sperm DNA up to 20.7 male cells per 100,000 female cells in never-pregnant females from unprotected sex !: refer :
The weird mystery RNA fragments delivered by sperm is only now first being mapped, to determine which RNA payloads express proteins and genes and what they might do in invaded primate tissues :
Sperm RNAs, in particular sperm microRNAs (miRNAs) and tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs), can mediate intergenerational transmission of paternally acquired phenotypes [epigenetics]
2015 : Semen has controlling power over female genes and behaviour
paper- 2019 - Nongenetic paternal effects via seminal fluid:
Our findings cast doubt on traditional breeding designs aimed at estimating the genetic effects of fathers on offspring, and challenge our views on the nature of inheritance.
I have read that women will carry a mans DNA with her for the rest of her life, and men do not carry any woman's DNA with them. It made me think of women who are promiscuous and sleep with a lot of men, or a lot of bad men. These women are messed up. I wonder if carrying all the DNA of those men effects them in all aspects. And not in a positive way.
I theorize with the vaccines, they have either female or male genetic DNA in them. What if a little baby boy who gets his shots and 80 percent of those shots have female DNA, would that also effect him? We are living in Mengele times.
Damn, this was informative. 100% of the sexually promiscuous woman I know are psychologically deranged to varying degrees and express male aggressiveness on the extreme end. Lots of partners causing biologically induced brain damage makes sense.
Ok so mods are a little odd ie "chem trails" being verboten yet Weather manipulation via air deployed chemicals has been done since vietnam.
I on the other hand love this shit.
I have a question regarding the DNA and IQ study i poked and found the full text for free but do you know what the pop science article was referring to with intelligence and mental health?
Anecdotally those two havent really been linked in my mind/ experience
I heard Paul Harvey talk about this over 30 years ago. He cited a study saying women who have been pregnant, no matter what the outcome of that pregnancy, are at less risk for breast cancer. I figured it was due to the protective effects of Progesterone, but the living cells thing sounds amazing!
WOW! even aborted children......
CORRECT, even SPERM ITSELF (no fetus) has big effects!!!!!
Not too many scientists feel welcome on GA, but I owe it to the community to chime in and say this post is correct.
Weird cell changes from mere sperm effects exist.
Females with NO sons and in fact no embryos of any kind EVER, have DNA in their bodies and brains from Men's SPERM ALONE!!!!
10% of nulligravid (never pregnant) females PROVEN to have male DNA in their bodies in large numbers of cells : sperm DNA up to 20.7 male cells per 100,000 female cells in never-pregnant females from unprotected sex !: refer :
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184
and 2012 other :
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458919/
The weird mystery RNA fragments delivered by sperm is only now first being mapped, to determine which RNA payloads express proteins and genes and what they might do in invaded primate tissues :
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200202/Sperm-microbiome-revealed-with-RNA-sequencing.aspx
Why do sperm carry RNA? Relatedness, conflict, and control:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.006
2018 : The sperm factor: paternal impact beyond genes:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0111-0
2016 : Epigenetic inheritance of acquired traits through sperm RNAs and sperm RNA modifications:
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.106
2015 : Semen has controlling power over female genes and behaviour
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730313-500-semen-has-controlling-power-over-female-genes-and-behaviour/
Revisiting telegony: Offspring inherit an acquired characteristic of their mother's previous mate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266322954_Revisiting_telegony_Offspring_inherit_an_acquired_characteristic_of_their_mother's_previous_mate
Microchimerism of male origin in a cohort of Danish girls
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19381956.2016.1218583
Women Store DNA From Every Man Theyβve Ever Made Love With, Study Finds
https://neonnettle.com/news/4209-women-store-dna-from-every-man-they-ve-ever-made-love-with-study-finds
paper- 2019 - Nongenetic paternal effects via seminal fluid:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6675144/
= = = = = = =
TL/DR : OP video is factual, but RNA from mere sperm is just as alarming
I have read that women will carry a mans DNA with her for the rest of her life, and men do not carry any woman's DNA with them. It made me think of women who are promiscuous and sleep with a lot of men, or a lot of bad men. These women are messed up. I wonder if carrying all the DNA of those men effects them in all aspects. And not in a positive way.
I theorize with the vaccines, they have either female or male genetic DNA in them. What if a little baby boy who gets his shots and 80 percent of those shots have female DNA, would that also effect him? We are living in Mengele times.
AMAZING comment most!! β¨
Thanks for sharing this fascinating information! π
Damn, this was informative. 100% of the sexually promiscuous woman I know are psychologically deranged to varying degrees and express male aggressiveness on the extreme end. Lots of partners causing biologically induced brain damage makes sense.
Buddy if you source posts like this you are always welcome here. Information is information, even if its false we then have sources to disprove.
Thanks but NOT TRUE, science facts with links get deleted on me often!
See? some recent ones :
https://archive.ph/YZSY4
That site archives rogue mod actions.
The deletions of facts from US Gov on fatherhood from science papers, is inexcusable.
That other deletion on DNA and IQ is likewise inexcusable:
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/1994ouKWIu/x/c
TL/DR: Science facts are provably often not welcome on GA
Ok so mods are a little odd ie "chem trails" being verboten yet Weather manipulation via air deployed chemicals has been done since vietnam.
I on the other hand love this shit.
I have a question regarding the DNA and IQ study i poked and found the full text for free but do you know what the pop science article was referring to with intelligence and mental health?
Anecdotally those two havent really been linked in my mind/ experience
ππππ»
I heard Paul Harvey talk about this over 30 years ago. He cited a study saying women who have been pregnant, no matter what the outcome of that pregnancy, are at less risk for breast cancer. I figured it was due to the protective effects of Progesterone, but the living cells thing sounds amazing!