Trump didn’t destroy her because he knows it would have backfired and made her a sympathetic figure with Independent/Undecided voters.
He stayed focused on making the connection between the financial stress in peoples lives and the policies of this Administration. He also made statements that he knew would be “fact checked” during the debate and proven to be true later.
President Trump has repeatedly shown the MSM does not moderate these debates, they assist their favored candidate. This ABC debate was so openly lopsided it has a former Clinton advisor calling for an investigation.
Finally, it was immediately clear the Harris campaign knew she did not win the debate. They would not ask for a mulligan if they truly believe she won. The risks far outweigh the benefits.
No matter how much the pundits tried to convince people to ignore the evidence of their eyes and ears, it didn’t matter. Their internal focus groups and snap polling showed she did not move the needle.
So you think that if she bombs spectacularly in the next debate, it will absolutely not be a reason for them to want to replace her? Not sure I follow the logic ...
Trump has already told us that there will be no second debate. Actually, he said third, but he's counting the one with Biden.
Trump didn’t destroy her because he knows it would have backfired and made her a sympathetic figure with Independent/Undecided voters.
He stayed focused on making the connection between the financial stress in peoples lives and the policies of this Administration. He also made statements that he knew would be “fact checked” during the debate and proven to be true later.
President Trump has repeatedly shown the MSM does not moderate these debates, they assist their favored candidate. This ABC debate was so openly lopsided it has a former Clinton advisor calling for an investigation.
Finally, it was immediately clear the Harris campaign knew she did not win the debate. They would not ask for a mulligan if they truly believe she won. The risks far outweigh the benefits.
No matter how much the pundits tried to convince people to ignore the evidence of their eyes and ears, it didn’t matter. Their internal focus groups and snap polling showed she did not move the needle.
The lure is to make her do it much closer to the election date, where they absolutely cannot replace her in a hurry.
They have absolutely no reason to replace Kamala. It's wishful thinking at this point.
So you think that if she bombs spectacularly in the next debate, it will absolutely not be a reason for them to want to replace her? Not sure I follow the logic ...
At this point it's literally too late to replace her while still remaining on the ballots
Lemme ask you a question. Lets say Kamala dies. Do you think then legally she can be replaced?
I think he will let himself be "forced into accepting another debate", but this time with one additional condition. He gets to choose her ear-rings!
Kek.
There was an earlier post showing a bunch of different polls.
Trump already won his first debate with her in the public's eye.
Perfect. Keep the loser in the game -- to lose.
I did think about this. Look what they did when Biden got his clock cleaned.