References to "Conspiracy Theories" always reminds me of what Richard Feynman said about science. He said:

Now I'm going to discuss how we would look for a new law. In general we look for a new law by the following process: First we guess it then ... we compute the consequences of the guess to see what if this is right. If this law that we guess is right, we see what it would imply and then we compare those computation results to Nature or we say compared to experiment or experience compare it directly with observation to see if it if it works.

If it disagrees with experiment it's wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science it doesn't make any difference how beautiful your guess is it doesn't make any difference how smart you are who made the guess or what his name is if it disagrees with experiment wrong that's all it is to it.

Basically, that is just how "conspiracy theories" arise.

The real point is that they are only required when the official narrative does not stand up to scrutiny and relevant details are being obviously covered up.