President Trump is pissed with Taylor Swift!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (168)
sorted by:
I don't. I don't exactly like her either, but she is among those stars who started quite young, and most likely were caught by the bad guys perhaps without realizing what was really happening, both they and the people, like their parents, who were supposed to look after them. So I can't hate her because to at least some extent she is probably a victim.
As well as her parents who may have also been tricked, unless her parents are the real degenerates ones who willingly sold their daughter in order to benefit from what she could bring to them.
And it probably isn't at all easy to get out of that trap when you have basically grown up in it. Now whether she is among the ones who have been also wholly corrupted by it, or is in it with still at least some part of her soul intact, who knows. But she still didn't walk into that life as an adult who fully realized what she was doing, or start to pursue it as an adult knowing what she would have to pay for it.
Not my problem.
Greed.
Quit making excuses.
Would you have stoned the woman taken in adultery?
Sorry don't pull a single quote to justify this woman's Satanic behavior.
1 Corinthians 15:33
Do not be deceived: “Bad company corrupts good.
3 John 1:11
Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good. The one who does good is of God; the one who does evil has not seen.
At the same time, we should note that a believer will not pursue a lifestyle of habitual and continual sin (1 John 3:8–9).
1 John 3:8-9 New International Version 8 The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work. 9 No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because they have been born of God.
I used that one because at least some interpretations say that the point why Jesus didn't condemn her was that there weren't any impartial witnesses to her sin. The people who brought her to him were trying to trap him. So perhaps it wasn't so much about forgiving her sin as it was the lack of that kind of proof for her sin which would have stood in a court of mere humans because the only witnesses present (at the court) were biased.
So, if you combine that with that part of the sermon on the mount: “Do not judge others, and you will not be judged. For you will be treated as you treat others. The standard you use in judging is the standard by which you will be judged. And why worry about a speck in your friend’s eye when you have a log in your own? How can you think of saying to your friend, ‘Let me help you get rid of that speck in your eye,’ when you can’t see past the log in your own eye? Hypocrite! First get rid of the log in your own eye; then you will see well enough to deal with the speck in your friend’s eye” (Matthew 7:1–3, NLT)
I don't know, perhaps avoid jumping to conclusion based on what you see on MSM, social media, and so on? How much do we really know of any of those people? Sure, some like the Clintons seem to have so many incidences in their past that they can't be innocents or even close to it in any way or form, but with people like Swift what we see is mostly Taylor Swift, the trademark, not so much Taylor Swift, the person. Maybe they are alike, or maybe Taylor Swift, the person, is somebody who is mostly just doing what her handlers tell her to do, and her public character is more of an act played by an actress than it is the real her. There doesn't seem to be all that much actual proof pointing towards either direction. If her public persona is an act recommended, or pushed, on her she certainly is guilty of at least greed, but would that make her evil?