I haven't, but your point is why I put my qualifier in. There is something I don't understand because Vance is so far very unimpressive. I could and probably are totally wrong. We'll see. I have been wrong soooo many times, I don't even get defensive when I am told I am wrong. Sad.
I don't even get defensive when I am told I am wrong. Sad.
No, that's good.
Anyway, the more valid data input you can harvest, the better positioned you'll be to see what's what. The lens we look through always affects how we perceive what we see.
I haven't, but your point is why I put my qualifier in. There is something I don't understand because Vance is so far very unimpressive. I could and probably are totally wrong. We'll see. I have been wrong soooo many times, I don't even get defensive when I am told I am wrong. Sad.
No, that's good.
Anyway, the more valid data input you can harvest, the better positioned you'll be to see what's what. The lens we look through always affects how we perceive what we see.