Considering all factors, the minimum amount of time for public attachment to be mitigated to the point where prosecuting beloved celebrities for heinous crimes would not cause a significant public upheaval could be as short as 5-10 years. Here’s why this is the shortest plausible timeline:
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
I think they are ignoring Most of America .....Again. Pretending actors are 'beloved' because we see them in a movie is absurd and pretending Americans would still think they are 'celebrity' if they are proven to be a criminal is worse. The greatest enemy of The People in history is the MSM and Most of these people are part of it.
I don't know that actors are quite as beloved as they used to be.
One only needs to point at the concept of the death of the movie star.
Few actors, nearly all of them aging out, can pull an audience by name.
Instead, most movies have become recycled slop -- worse, recycled slop that relies on the characters that were built beforehand.
I'm sure I'd miss a few, but the list is short anyway.
Ryan Reynolds, Hugh Jackman and Tom Cruise are three of the short list that can draw an audience based on name alone, and they are of course the names involved with recent smash hits.
But the latter two are aging out, and Ryan Reynolds is about two wrongthink jokes from being cancelled.
Gone are the days when you'd see a movie because it has Stallone or Schwarzenegger on billing.
How cool is it that I've never heard of Ryan Reynolds
This is awesome
You're not missing much. He's a turd wrapped in gilt leaved cellophane like most of tinsel town.