237 years ago today, the Constitution for the United States of America was signed.
Did everyone forget?
Citizen: What have you given us, Mr. Franklin?
Benjamin Franklin: A republic, if you can keep it.
"IF"
We the People have not done our jobs.
It is time to resolve to change that behavior.
What’s your best resource for ditching SSN/DL and operating as a free man?
I offer these posts, for holding officials accountable in office between elections, and for filing legal notices.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2IAdVKr/x/c/4TwS5hfz3uG
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tebrcPqw/i-have-served-the-california-sta/c/
Response to your two links:
First link --
I would do what I did here on GAW. First, I read the Pfizer "study" and discovered that it did NOT prove anything regarding transmission of illness. They even SAID it in the study. The entire thing was a fake study.
Later, I discovered that the face mask "mandates" all came from the CDC, and reading through their paper of their GUIDELINE (they called it a guideline, but everyone else falsely claimed it was a mandate), they stated at the bottom of their paper what their legal authority was. It was a federal law that, if you looked it up (as I did), was ONLY for quarantine of ANIMALS and PLANTS -- nothing at all to do with humans -- and ONLY for importation from outside the USA to within.
The federal government has ONLY LIMITED jurisdiction.
So, I would have made public speeches and executive orders recognizing that the entire thing was a sham AND that the federal government had NO JURISDICTION.
I would have also considered arresting some people for COERSION and FRAUD, which can be misdemeanors or felonies, depending on circumstances.
Second link --
I think the only way to deal with this is to file a Writ of Quo Warranto in the courts. Courts are corrupt, so expect a dismissal.
Next, appeal and/or file a Collateral suit against the judge and his co-conspirators to void his judgement. If a judge issues any decision, and uses a false statement of fact or law in rendering that judgement, it constitutes "Fraud on the Court."
A judgement rendered by Fraud on the Court is a "Void Judgement," but to make it void, there has to be lawsuit against the judge to make it happen.
I would appeal these to the US Supreme Court and, if mayor, make a big public stink about it.
I don't think it is necessary to ditch SSN/DL.
If you want to be free in the current unfree world:
freedomlawschool.org - use the law to stop paying income taxes
tacticalcivics.com - take back control of local government
precinctstrategy.com - take back control of local GOP party
jurisdictionary.com -- handle your own lawsuits
For anyone who "owes child support" or even if you do not, go check out Rick W. on Youtube. He is ONLY interested in child support cases, BUT ... understand the CONCEPTS he brings to family court, and use that against ANY government claim against you.
Bottom line: Courts are corrupt. You already know that. But what you don't know is HOW they get away with it. They take shortcuts (evade the Rule of Law) because they CAN (for now). They get away with it because (a) Average Joe does not understand the law or how the courts are abusing them, and thinks his attorney will handle it for them (MOST ATTORNEYS HAVE LOSING TRACK RECORDS), and (b) most attorneys graduate law school without really understanding the law, either, and their duty is to the court (government) and NOT to the client who pays the bills. This combination is a good way for attorneys to IGNORE the law and just do what the judge wants, and NOT what the law allows/requires to really defend their client.
Ultimately, the Constitution is a LAW. The government was set up by way of creating LAW for it to operate.
We MUST get back to the common man understanding the LAW and using it to uphold Rule of Law aginst the government employees who WILL abuse it whenever they think they can gain an advantage by doing so.
Imagine throwing the average, fat slob into a ring with an amateur boxer and telling him to fight. He would not know what to do.
But train him, get him in physical shape, change his mental attitude to fight rather than flight, and you get a different result.
That is the change that is needed.
THEN (and only then) will you realize that SSN & DL are irrelevant nuisances, but not something that can enslave you. Only YOU can allow that to happen -- but you need to train for the fight. Learn the LAW.
to give a more direct answer, you would need an express trust under common law. as the elites say, own nothing, control everything
https://archive.org/details/trustee-handbook-1
You don't need a trust.
However, understanding trust law can make all income taxes disappear, and provide great asset protection -- but it requires a knowledge of multiple aspects of law, not just trust law.
Took me many years to figure it out. I doubt that not more than 1 in 10,000 CPA's could do it. Same goes for most attorneys.
Regarding common law trusts and "express trusts," I have read that document you posted and I agree with some of it, but not all of it.
An express trust is nothing more than a trust where the parties agree they are creating a trust, whereas an implied trust is a sitution that might be construed as a trust under law, even if the parties did not necessarily intend it. There is nothing more to it.
Regarding common law vs. state law, I think utilizing state law actually creates a better asset protection structure, and a better tax situation, than common law. That's because most courts today would not understand how to deal with common law -- and most trustees and attorneys wouldn't, either. Matter of fact, most would be hostile to it and try to cause problems, whereas they understand state law because they can "look it up." Common law requires much more knowledge, which is not taught in law school anymore.
Have you actually USED a common law trust for any period of time?
I do think it is possible to do it, but I see advantages to using certain states instead, as a practical matter in the real world today.