Diabolical indeed. If you think about it, not only were thousands injured, so many had their hands and fingers blown off. They will never be able to shoot a weapon again. Forced early retirement from terrorism. Win win.
What has led you to conclude that someone with a Hezbollah pager is a terrorist? Regardless of whom you support, are you in support of an indiscriminate attack that kills innocent civilians? The first fatality was a 10-year-old girl. Is that win-win for you?
And what is your position on the second amendment in the USA? If you support it I have further questions about your characterization of Hezbollah.
It's been well documented that Hezbollah is a militant organization with ties to terrorism. Of course I do not support the innocents that were harmed. That is tragic but often a consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage.
I fully support our Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, ideologically and in actual practice.
So you are well aware that if you exercise your 2nd amendment rights together with likeminded people against an enemy who has the favor of someone in the media, you'll be branded a militant organization, yes? And very likely domestic terrorists? If someone responds to your group's defense efforts by interdicting products you purchase to cause them to explode parts of your body off, forcing your "early retirement" from "terrorism", should society consider that a "win win"? A tragic consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage?
Diabolical indeed. If you think about it, not only were thousands injured, so many had their hands and fingers blown off. They will never be able to shoot a weapon again. Forced early retirement from terrorism. Win win.
What has led you to conclude that someone with a Hezbollah pager is a terrorist? Regardless of whom you support, are you in support of an indiscriminate attack that kills innocent civilians? The first fatality was a 10-year-old girl. Is that win-win for you?
And what is your position on the second amendment in the USA? If you support it I have further questions about your characterization of Hezbollah.
It's been well documented that Hezbollah is a militant organization with ties to terrorism. Of course I do not support the innocents that were harmed. That is tragic but often a consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage.
I fully support our Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, ideologically and in actual practice.
So you are well aware that if you exercise your 2nd amendment rights together with likeminded people against an enemy who has the favor of someone in the media, you'll be branded a militant organization, yes? And very likely domestic terrorists? If someone responds to your group's defense efforts by interdicting products you purchase to cause them to explode parts of your body off, forcing your "early retirement" from "terrorism", should society consider that a "win win"? A tragic consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage?