BREAKING: A federal judge in South Carolina just issued a precedent-setting ruling that voter rolls are public record under federal law and are subject to inspection by election integrity activists
"Accordingly, the Court declares that the South Carolina Statewide Voter Registration List is a record subject to inspection pursuant to the NVRA, and that the NVRA preempts any South Carolina law limiting access to the Statewide Voter Registration List to South Carolina registered voters." - Judge Joseph Anderson Jr.
@PILFoundation
filed the lawsuit after the South Carolina Election Commission refused to turn over the state's voter rolls for inspection. After hearing oral arguments Monday morning, the judge immediately made his ruling
From here on out, no state or local jurisdiction can create laws or rules limiting access to voter rolls. It will be YUGE when validating the authenticity of the 2024 election.
From X post
BREAKING: A federal judge in South Carolina just issued a precedent-setting ruling that voter rolls are public record under federal law and are subject to inspection by election integrity activists
"Accordingly, the Court declares that the South Carolina Statewide Voter Registration List is a record subject to inspection pursuant to the NVRA, and that the NVRA preempts any South Carolina law limiting access to the Statewide Voter Registration List to South Carolina registered voters." - Judge Joseph Anderson Jr.
@PILFoundation filed the lawsuit after the South Carolina Election Commission refused to turn over the state's voter rolls for inspection. After hearing oral arguments Monday morning, the judge immediately made his ruling
From here on out, no state or local jurisdiction can create laws or rules limiting access to voter rolls. It will be YUGE when validating the authenticity of the 2024 election.
So, does this automatically apply to every state or just South Carolina?